Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v City of Swan & Ors
[2010] HCATrans 82
[2010] HCATrans 082
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Sydney No S1 of 2010
B e t w e e n -
LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC
Appellant
and
CITY OF SWAN
First Respondent
PARKES SHIRE COUNCIL
Second Respondent
WINGECARRIBEE SHIRE COUNCIL
Third Respondent
LEHMAN BROTHERS AUSTRALIA LIMITED (SUBJECT TO A DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT)
Fourth Respondent
NEIL SINGLETON
Fifth Respondent
STEPHEN PARBERY
Sixth Respondent
LEHMAN BROTHERS ASIA HOLDINGS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
Seventh Respondent
Office of the Registry
Sydney No S362 of 2009
B e t w e e n -
LEHMAN BROTHERS ASIA HOLDINGS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
Appellant
and
CITY OF SWAN
First Respondent
PARKES SHIRE COUNCIL
Second Respondent
WINGECARRIBEE SHIRE COUNCIL
Third Respondent
LEHMAN BROTHERS AUSTRALIA LIMITED (SUBJECT TO DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT)
Fourth Respondent
NEIL SINGLETON
Fifth Respondent
STEPHEN PARBERY
Sixth Respondent
LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC
Seventh Respondent
FRENCH CJ
GUMMOW J
HAYNE J
HEYDON J
KIEFEL J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT CANBERRA ON TUESDAY, 30 MARCH 2010, AT 10.18 AM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
__________________
FRENCH CJ: These appeals from the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia were heard on 9 and 10 February 2010 by a Court constituted by Justices Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Kiefel and myself. The Court would dismiss the appeals. The orders of the Court are:
In matter No S1 of 2010:
1.Appeal dismissed.
2.The appellant pay the costs of the first, second and third respondents.
In matter No S362 of 2009:
1.Appeal dismissed.
2.The appellant pay the costs of the first, second and third respondents.
I publish those orders. The reasons for the Court’s orders will be delivered at a later date.
AT 10.19 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Commercial Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Standing
-
Statutory Construction
-
Jurisdiction
0
0