Legal Services Commissioner v Williamson

Link copied
Case Copied 59 min read

QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


CITATION:

Legal Services Commissioner v Williamson [2019] QCAT 82

PARTIES:

LEGAL SERVICES COMMISSIONER
(applicant)

v

JENNIFER LESLIE WILLIAMSON

(respondent)

APPLICATION NO:

071 of 2015

MATTER TYPE:

Occupational regulation matters

DELIVERED ON:

16 April 2019

HEARING DATE:

6 February 2018

HEARD AT:

Brisbane

DECISION OF:

Justice Daubney, President

Assisted by:
Mr Ken Horsley
Dr Margaret Steinberg AM

ORDERS:

1.   The discipline application filed 29 April 2015 is dismissed.

2.   The Tribunal will hear the parties as to costs.

CATCHWORDS:

PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – LAWYERS – COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINE – PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT AND UNSATISFACTORY PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT – GENERAL – where the respondent is charged with witnessing a transferor’s signature on a land transfer which was not signed in her presence contrary to s 162 of the Land Title Act 1994 (Qld) – where the respondent is charged with acting without instructions in endorsing the transferee’s execution of the transfer – where the respondent is found to have allowed a transferor’s signature on the execution of a land transfer to be incorrectly dated – whether allowing a transferor’s signature on a land transfer to be incorrectly dated is unsatisfactory professional conduct within the meaning of s 418 of the Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld)

Duties Act 2001 (Qld), s 16
Land Title Act 1994 (Qld), s 162
Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld), s 418, s 419, s 452, s 656C

Adamson v Queensland Law Society [1990] 1 Qd R 498
Attorney-General v Bax [1999] 2 Qd R 9; [1998] QCA 089
Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34
De Kuyper v Crafter [1942] SASR 238
Legal Services Commissioner v Bone [2013] QCAT 550
Legal Services Commissioner v Laylee & Anor [2016] QCAT 237
Legal Services Commissioner v McClelland [2006] LPT 13
Legal Services Commissioner v Sorban [2009] LPT 5

APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:

Applicant:

G R Rice QC, instructed by Legal Services Commissioner

Respondent:

G Page QC, with R Sibley, instructed by Williamson & Associates

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. On 11 January 2010, one Timothy John Henderson made an online complaint to the applicant, Legal Services Commissioner, about the respondent solicitor, Ms Jennifer Williamson.  The complaint was said to have been made by Henderson “for and on behalf of Leanne Apostolakis”.  The complaint form alleged:

    The Respondent signed a Form 1 Title Document stating she witnessed the signatures on it before paying the duty payable, however the signature is a forgery and Mrs Apostolakis was not in the State of Queensland at that time.

  2. The complaint form stated further:

    On the 18th June, 2007, Jennifer Williamson witnessed a Land Titles Transfer Form 1, which was purportedly signed by Mrs Leanne Apostolakis on the 15th June 2007 and her husband, Mr Thomas Edward Apostolakis also on the 15th June, 2007.

    The Titles Transfer Form shows that Ms Williamson then proceeded to pay the Duty on the Transfer which has been confirmed by the Office of State Revenue, however the titles was then never lodged.

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Legal Services Commissioner v Williamson and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] QCAT 82
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Legal Services Commissioner v Williamson, the respondent, a legal practitioner, was charged with several acts of professional misconduct and unsatisfactory professional conduct. The primary issues were the respondent witnessing a transferor’s signature on a land transfer which was not signed in her presence, acting without instructions in endorsing the transferee’s execution of the transfer, and allowing a transferor’s signature on the execution of a land transfer to be incorrectly dated. These actions contravened various statutory provisions, including section 162 of the Land Title Act 1994 (Qld) and section 418 of the Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld). The court was tasked with determining whether these actions constituted unsatisfactory professional conduct.

The court considered the gravity and nature of the respondent’s actions, particularly the failure to ensure the correct execution dates were inserted on legal documents. The court emphasised the importance of meticulous attention to detail and adherence to legal requirements in professional practice. It was noted that the respondent's actions, while not amounting to serious professional misconduct, still represented a failure to meet the expected standards of professional conduct. The court found that allowing a transferor’s signature to be incorrectly dated did indeed constitute unsatisfactory professional conduct.

Given the findings, the court dismissed the discipline application filed on 29 April 2015, but directed that the parties be heard regarding costs. The outcome of the case underscores the necessity for legal practitioners to meticulously verify documents and accurately record execution dates to avoid similar issues in the future.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The discipline application filed 29 April 2015 is dismissed.

2. The Tribunal will hear the parties as to costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

All of that being said, this case serves as a timely reminder of the need for legal practitioners to check documents carefully, and to be scrupulous when attending to details such as the insertion of correct execution dates.Conclusion The orders of the Tribunal are as follows:

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.