Legal Services Commissioner v Johnston

Link copied
Case Copied 12 min read
CITATION: Legal Services Commissioner v Johnston [2015] QCAT 480
PARTIES: Legal Services Commissioner (Applicant/Appellant)
v
Suzanne Machelle Johnston
(Respondent)
APPLICATION NUMBER: OCR156-14
MATTER TYPE: Occupational Regulation matters
HEARING DATE: 8 December 2015
HEARD AT: Brisbane
DECISION OF: Justice DG Thomas, President
Assisted by:
Mr Scott Anderson, Legal panel member
Dr Margaret Steinberg AM, Lay panel member
DELIVERED ON: 15 December 2015
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
ORDERS MADE:

1.    The name of the respondent, Suzanne Machelle Johnston, be removed from the roll of practitioners kept by the Supreme Court of Queensland.

2.    The respondent pay the applicant’s costs, to be assessed on the Supreme Court scale.

CATCHWORDS:

PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – LAWYERS –
MISCONDUCT, UNFITNESS AND DISCIPLINE – GROUNDS OF DISCIPLINARY ORDERS – In general – where eleven charges for determination in discipline application including failing to maintain competence and diligence, trust account breaches and failing to respond to s 443 notices under the Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld) – where no appearance for respondent solicitor – where respondent found guilty of all charges – where respondent found guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct in relation to charges regarding competence and diligence – where respondent found guilty of professional misconduct in relation to eight charges regarding failure to comply with s 433 notices – where respondent found guilty of professional misconduct in relation to the trust account breaches - whether respondent had
demonstrated unfitness to practice by her conduct and should be removed from the local roll – whether respondent should pay applicant’s costs of the application

Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld) ss 7(4), 244, 250, 259(1), 265, 268, 420(1)(a), 443, 462, 701, 712.

Legal Profession Regulation 2007 (Qld) rr 33(2)(c), 37(2).

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) ss 92, 93.

Legal Services Commissioner v Thomas [2009] LPT 13 at [61].

APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):

APPLICANT: Scott, A. of Counsel.
RESPONDENT: No appearance.

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. The Legal Services Commissioner brought charges against Ms Johnston alleging:

    ·       a failure to exercise competence and diligence;

    ·       the making of false representations;

    · failures to comply with s 443 notices under the Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld) (the Act); and

    ·       various breaches of the Legal Profession Regulations 2007 (Qld) (the Regulations) relating to trust accounts maintained by Ms Johnston.

Background

Kilham matter

  1. Ms Johnston acted for Mr Kilham and his wife, Ms Phillips, with respect to a conveyancing transaction in which they were vendors.  Settlement took place on 30 October 2009 and a settlement statement provided by Ms Johnston to her clients indicated that a deposit in the sum of $2,000.00 had been paid.

  2. Mr Kilham made enquiries concerning that deposit.  By way of an email dated 27 May 2010 he informed Ms Johnston that, whilst the settlement statement suggested a deposit of $2,000.00 was paid on the exchange of contracts, the agent had advised him that no deposit had in fact been paid.

  3. Ms Johnston responded on 3 September 2010 saying:

    Ms Overvest, the Buyer, attended settlement personally on…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Legal Services Commissioner v Johnston and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2015] QCAT 480
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Legal Services Commissioner v Johnston, the Legal Services Commissioner brought a disciplinary action against Suzanne Machelle Johnston, a practicing solicitor in Queensland. The application included eleven charges, including breaches of competence and diligence, trust account breaches, and failure to respond to notices under the Legal Profession Act 2007. The respondent did not appear in court, leading to her being found guilty of all charges. The court had to determine whether the respondent's conduct demonstrated unfitness to practice, warranting her removal from the local roll, and whether she should pay the Commissioner's costs.

The court was tasked with assessing whether the respondent's actions constituted unsatisfactory professional conduct or professional misconduct under the Legal Profession Act. The charges related to the respondent's competence and diligence, her failure to respond to notices, and her breaches of trust account management. The court considered the respondent's absence and the severity of the charges to determine her fitness to continue practicing law. Additionally, the court had to decide on the appropriate disciplinary measures, including the possibility of removing the respondent from the roll of practitioners and ordering her to pay costs.

The court found that the respondent's conduct demonstrated unfitness to practice law. The charges of unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct were substantiated by the evidence presented. The respondent's failure to maintain competence and diligence, her non-compliance with notices, and her breaches of trust account management all contributed to the court's decision. Consequently, the court ordered the removal of Suzanne Machelle Johnston from the roll of practitioners and mandated her to pay the Commissioner's costs, to be assessed on the Supreme Court scale.

In summary, the court's decision was that Suzanne Machelle Johnston's conduct warranted her removal from the legal profession. The severity of her breaches, including failing to maintain competence, non-compliance with notices, and trust account breaches, led to the conclusion that she was unfit to practice law. The court ordered her removal from the roll of practitioners and directed her to pay the Commissioner's costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The name of the respondent, Suzanne Machelle Johnston, be removed from the roll of practitioners kept by the Supreme Court of Queensland.

2. The respondent pay the applicant’s costs, to be assessed on the Supreme Court scale.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.