Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner v A Practitioner
Case
•
[2019] SASCFC 126
•11 October 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner v A Practitioner [2019] SASCFC 126
[2019] SASCFC 126
11 October 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner brought disciplinary proceedings against a practitioner before the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia. The proceedings concerned allegations of professional misconduct arising from the practitioner's conduct in relation to a client's affairs.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal had the power to extend the time limit for the commencement of disciplinary proceedings in circumstances where the complaint was made outside the prescribed period. This question was referred to the Full Court for determination.
The Court considered the relevant provisions of the *Legal Practitioners Act 1981* (SA) and the *Limitation of Actions Act 1936* (SA). It concluded that the *Limitation of Actions Act* did not apply to disciplinary proceedings before the Tribunal, and that the Tribunal did not possess an inherent or statutory power to extend the time limit for bringing such proceedings. Accordingly, the answer to the question referred by the Tribunal was determined to be "No".
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal had the power to extend the time limit for the commencement of disciplinary proceedings in circumstances where the complaint was made outside the prescribed period. This question was referred to the Full Court for determination.
The Court considered the relevant provisions of the *Legal Practitioners Act 1981* (SA) and the *Limitation of Actions Act 1936* (SA). It concluded that the *Limitation of Actions Act* did not apply to disciplinary proceedings before the Tribunal, and that the Tribunal did not possess an inherent or statutory power to extend the time limit for bringing such proceedings. Accordingly, the answer to the question referred by the Tribunal was determined to be "No".
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Limitation Periods
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
1
Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner v Fittock
[2017] SASCFC 169