Leeth v The Commonwealth of Australia
[1992] HCATrans 200
•
,
•
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Brisbane No B25 of 1990 B e t w e e n -
RICHARD SHIERK LEETH
Plaintiff
and
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Defendant
Judgment
BRENNAN J
TOOHEY J
GAUDRON J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
| Leeth(2) | 94 | 25/6/92 |
AT BRISBANE ON THURSDAY, 25 JUNE 1992, AT 9.36 AM
(Continued from 24/9/91)
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Brisbane No B29 of 1989 B e t w e e n -
RICHARD SHIERK LEETH
Applicant
and
THE QUEEN
Respondent
Office of the Registry
Brisbane No B31 of 1989 B e t w e e n -
WILLIAM BRUCE KIRK
Applicant
and
THE QUEEN
Respondent
Office of the Registry
Brisbane No B37 of 1989 B e t w e e n -
DALE STEWART KIRK
Applicant
and
THE QUEEN
Respondent
| Leeth(2) | 95 | 25/6/92 |
| Office of the Registry |
Brisbane No B38 of 1989 B e t w e e n -
PAUL JOSEPH DONOVAN
Applicant
and
THE QUEEN
Respondent
Discussion on standing special
leave matters over
(Reasons for judgment were delivered)
| BRENNAN J: | The Court's order does not provide for costs. |
Do counsel wish to say anything with respect to
that matter?
| MR D.J. McGILL: | I ask for costs, Your Honour. |
| MR K.C. FLEMING: | Your Honour, the OPP was represented in |
part in that whilst it did not argue the
constitutional point, it did argue in respect ofthe special leave application which, Your Honours
might recall, was at the same time.
| BRENNAN J: | The special leave applications may as well be |
called now for mention, and it will be necessary, I
would have thought, to adjourn those special leave
applications to a date to be fixed.
| MR FLEMING: | Yes. |
BRENNAN J: So, for the moment, we are concerned with the
question of costs in respect of the constitutional
issue.
| MR FLEMING: | Thank you, Your Honour. |
| Leeth(2) | 96 | 25/6/92 |
| BRENNAN J: | I suppose more accurately, with respect to the |
proceeding involving the constitutional issue as
distinct from the applications for special leave.
MR FLEMING: Yes, thank you, Your Honour.
| BRENNAN J: | Is there any opposition to Mr McGill's request |
for costs?
MR T. BAILEY :In respect of the applicant, Leeth,
Your Honour, I have no submissions to make.
| MR A.J. RAFTER: | Nor have I, Your Honour. |
| BRENNAN J: | Does that account for all parties? |
| MR | : | Yes, Your Honour, the Attorney-General for |
South Australia intervened on the hearing of the appeal.
BRENNAN J: Yes. But all parties are now represented?
| MR | That is so, Your Honour. |
| BRENNAN J: | Mr McGill's application is not resisted, is that |
the situation?
| MR BAILEY: | From my own part, Your Honour, not in relation |
to the applicant, Leeth. I appear only for Leeth.
MR RAFTER: If the Court pleases, I appear for the other
applicants, and there is no submission in relation
to that matter, Your Honour.
| BRENNAN J: | As the Court presently constituted is not the |
same Court in its entirety as that which made the
order which I have pronounced, the submissions made
by counsel will be noted and considered by the
entire Court and, in due course, an order, if any,
will be made.
As to the special leave applications in this
matter, that is, the four special leave
applications of Leeth v Reg, Kirk v Reg, Kirk v
Reg, and Donovan v Reg, is counsel present
representing each of those applicants?
MR RAFTER: Yes, if the Court pleases, I appear for the
three, Kirk, Kirk and Donovan.
BRENNAN J: Kirk, Kirk and Donovan.
| MR BAILEY: | Yes and, Your Honour, I appear for Leeth. |
BRENNAN J: In those circumstances, do you wish to say anything as to the suggestion that the matter
should stand over?
| Leeth(2) | 97 | 25/6/92 |
| MR BAILEY: | No, Your Honour. |
| MR RAFTER: | No, Your Honour. |
| BRENNAN J: | Mr McGill? |
| MR McGILL: | I am not in those proceedings. |
| MR FLEMING: | That is of interest to me, Your Honour. | I |
appear for the Director of Public Prosecutions, but
there is no objection to it standing over.
BRENNAN J: Yes. Well, in those circumstances, those
applications will stand over to a date to be fixed.
AT 9.40 AM THE MATTERS WERE ADJOURNED
TO A DATE TO BE FIXED
| Leeth(2) | 98 | 25/6/92 |
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Constitutional Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Standing
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
0
0
0