DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Leed Engineering and Construction Pty Ltd
(AG2015/2254)

LEED ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015 - 2018 (LEED EA 2015)

Building, metal and civil construction industries
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN	ADELAIDE, 2 APRIL 2015

Application for approval of the Leed Engineering and Construction Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015-2018 (Leed EA 2015).

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Leed Engineering and Construction Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015-2018 (Leed EA 2015) (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Leed Engineering and Construction Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] As the Agreement does not contain a flexibility term which meets the requirements of s.203 of the Act, the model flexibility term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] As the Agreement does not contain a consultation term which meets the requirements of s.205 of the Act, the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 1 July 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 July 2018.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Leed Engineering and Construction Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for the approval of the Leed Engineering and Construction Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015-2018 (Leed EA 2015). The application was made under section 234 of the Fair Work Act 2009, seeking the Commission's endorsement of the agreement reached between the company and the union. The dispute centred on the fairness and validity of various terms within the Leed EA 2015, particularly those concerning wages, working conditions, and procedural matters.

The Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the 'better off overall test' as stipulated by the Fair Work Act. This required the Commission to assess if the employees were better off overall under the proposed agreement compared to the applicable award or safety net. Furthermore, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement contained any unlawful or unfair provisions, including those that might undermine the safety net or contradict public policy. The central issue was whether the Leed EA 2015 provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees while adhering to the statutory framework.

In reaching its decision, the Commission carefully reviewed the terms of the Leed EA 2015 against the criteria set by the Fair Work Act. It found that the agreement met the better off overall test, as it provided employees with increased wages and improved working conditions. The Commission also noted that the agreement contained no unlawful or unfair provisions and did not undermine the safety net. Consequently, the Commission approved the Leed EA 2015, confirming its compliance with the necessary legal standards. The decision was made in favour of Leed Engineering and Construction Pty Ltd, and the agreement was endorsed for implementation.

Leed Engineering and Construction Pty Ltd

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established