Lee and Zaplan

Case [2015] FCCA 3258


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

LEE & ZAPLAN [2015] FCCA 3258
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Interim arrangements for child aged 5 years – nature of interim hearing – orders pending final hearing scheduled for May of 2016 – family report ordered but not as yet to hand – significant disputes of fact – allegations of family violence – presumption of equal shared parental responsibility – which school should child attend pending final hearing – meaningful parental relationships – section 60CC factors – best interests.

Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975, ss.4AB, 60CA, 60CC, 61DA

Goode & Goode (2006) FLC 93-286
re G: Children’s Schooling (2000) FLC 93-025
Eden & Eden-Proust [2011] FamCAFC 138
Applicant: MR LEE
Respondent: MS ZAPLAN
File Number: ADC 2138 of 2015
Judgment of: Judge Brown
Hearing date: 3 December 2015
Date of Last Submission: 3 December 2015
Delivered at: Adelaide
Delivered on: 8 December 2015

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Ms Horvat
Solicitors for the Applicant: Rudall & Rudall
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Charman
Solicitors for the Respondent: Ian Charman & Associates

ORDERS

UNTIL FURTHER OR OTHER ORDER

  1. The child X born (omitted) 2010 live with the mother.

  2. The father spend time with the child X as follows:

    (a)each Thursday, Sunday and Tuesday of each week between 10:00am and 5:00pm commencing on 10 December 2015; and

    (b)on Christmas Day 2015 between 10:00am and 5:00pm.

  3. All handovers other than those which occur at school pursuant to order 5 hereof take place at the (omitted) Police Station.

  4. The mother is authorised by these orders to enrol the child at the (omitted) Primary School at the commencement of the school year in 2016.

  5. The father spend time with the child X commencing Term 1 in 2016 from after school on Tuesdays and Thursdays until 6:30pm with the father to collect the child from the school and return the child to the mother at the (omitted) Police Station.

  6. Further consideration of the matter is adjourned to 24 March 2016 at 9:30am.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Lee & Zaplan is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT ADELAIDE

ADC 2138 of 2015

MR LEE

Applicant

And

MS ZAPLAN

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. This judgment relates to appropriate interim arrangements for the care of a five year old child, X born (omitted) 2010, until the final hearing, which is currently scheduled for 26 & 27 May 2016.

  2. In conjunction with the final hearing, it has been ordered that a family report be prepared.  This report will examine X’s relationship with her mother, Ms Zaplan (also known as Ms Zaplan) and her father, Mr Lee.  The report is expected to be to hand on 7 March 2016. 

  3. The father seeks that X should live mainly with him or failing that, in a shared care arrangement.  The mother asserts that she has always been X’s primary carer and that the father is a violent…

Continue reading Lee and Zaplan

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Lee and Zaplan [2015] FCCA 3258
Case
[2015] FCCA 3258
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Lee and Zaplan*, heard before Judge Brown, the dispute concerned parenting orders for a child, X, born in 2010. The orders made by the court addressed the living arrangements for the child and the father's time with the child.

The court was required to determine the specific arrangements for the child's residence and the father's contact. This included establishing a schedule for the father to spend time with the child, specifying the days and times, as well as the locations for handovers between parents. The court also needed to make orders regarding the child's schooling.

The court ordered that the child X would live with the mother. The father was granted specific time with the child on Thursdays, Sundays, and Tuesdays between 10:00 am and 5:00 pm, commencing on 10 December 2015, and also on Christmas Day 2015 within the same hours. Handovers were to occur at a designated Police Station, except for those at school. The mother was authorised to enrol the child at a primary school for the commencement of the 2016 school year. From Term 1 of 2016, the father's time with the child was to extend to after school on Tuesdays and Thursdays until 6:30 pm, with the father responsible for collecting and returning the child. Further consideration of the matter was adjourned to a later date.

Orders

Orders of the court

UNTIL FURTHER OR OTHER ORDER

1.

The child X born (omitted) 2010 live with the mother.

2.

The father spend time with the child X as follows:

(a) each Thursday, Sunday and Tuesday of each week between 10:00am and 5:00pm commencing on 10 December 2015; and

(b) on Christmas Day 2015 between 10:00am and 5:00pm.

3.

All handovers other than those which occur at school pursuant to order 5 hereof take place at the (omitted) Police Station.

4.

The mother is authorised by these orders to enrol the child at the (omitted) Primary School at the commencement of the school year in 2016.

5.

The father spend time with the child X commencing Term 1 in 2016 from after school on Tuesdays and Thursdays until 6:30pm with the father to collect the child from the school and return the child to the mother at the (omitted) Police Station.

6.

Further consideration of the matter is adjourned to 24 March 2016 at 9:30am.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.