Le (Migration)
[2017] AATA 2336
•9 November 2017
Le (Migration) [2017] AATA 2336 (9 November 2017)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr Viet Dung Le
CASE NUMBER: 1618175
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2016/2803249
MEMBER:Kate Millar
DATE:9 November 2017
PLACE OF DECISION: Adelaide
DECISION:The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.
Statement made on 09 November 2017 at 10:18am
CATCHWORDS
Migration – Cancellation - Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 573 (Higher Education Sector) – Notification of decision – Applicant failed to apply for reinstatement
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 362B, 362C
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 31 October 2016 to cancel the applicant’s Subclass 573 Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
On 25 October 2017 the Tribunal dismissed the application under s.362B(1A)(b) of the Act as the review applicant did not appear before it to give evidence and present arguments at the time and date of the scheduled hearing.
The review applicant was notified of the dismissal decision and given a copy of a written statement setting out the decision and the reasons for the decision, in accordance with s.362C(5). The review applicant was advised that reinstatement of the application could be sought within 14 days of receiving the dismissal statement and that a failure to apply for reinstatement within the 14 day period would result in confirmation of the dismissal decision.
As the review applicant did not apply for reinstatement of the application within the 14 days period, the Tribunal must confirm the decision to dismiss the application. In these circumstances, the decision under review is taken to be affirmed.
DECISION
The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.
Kate Millar
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
-
Statutory Construction
0
0
0