Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
1
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
Hawcroft v Hawcroft General Trading Co Pty Ltd
[2016] NSWSC 555
Citation 1
…010] 1 All ER 174; David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353; Hawcroft v Hawcroft General Trading Co Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 555; K Lokumal & Sons London Ltd v Lotte Shopping Company Pte Ltd [1985] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 28; Republic of India v India Steamship Co Ltd (No.2) [1998] AC 878; Row…
-
Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon
[1993] HCA 4
Citation 2
…doctrine of mistake – whether party estopped from avoiding agreement where party received benefit Cases Cited: Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon (1993) 176 CLR 344; Commissioners for Revenue and Customs v Bencholder Ltd [2010] 1 All ER 174; David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353;…
-
David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
[1992] HCA 48
Citation 3
…CLR 344; Commissioners for Revenue and Customs v Bencholder Ltd [2010] 1 All ER 174; David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353; Hawcroft v Hawcroft General Trading Co Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 555; K Lokumal & Sons London Ltd v Lotte Shopping Company Pte Ltd [1985] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 28; Rep…
-
Thompson v Palmer
[1933] HCA 61
Citation 4
…lic of India v India Steamship Co Ltd (No.2) [1998] AC 878; Rowland v Divall [1923] 2 KB 500; Ryan v Moore [2005] 2 SCR 53; Thompson v Palmer (1933) 49 CLR 507;…
-
Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon
[1993] HCATrans 100
Citation 5
…– whether agreement void due to doctrine of mistake – whether party estopped from avoiding agreement where party received benefit Cases Cited: Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon (1993) 176 CLR 344; Commissioners for Revenue and Customs v Bencholder Ltd [2010] 1 All ER 174; David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 1…