LB v Hunter New England Area Health Service
Case
•
[2010] NSWADT 82
•31 March 2010
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
LB v Hunter New England Area Health Service [2010] NSWADT 82
[2010] NSWADT 82
31 March 2010
CaseChat Overview and Summary
LB brought a complaint against Hunter New England Area Health Service alleging breaches of the privacy principle in relation to the collection and accuracy of health information. The complaint arose from the defendant's handling of unsolicited health information provided by LB’s former partner. The matter was brought before the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT).
The legal issues before the Tribunal were whether the defendant breached the health privacy principle by collecting and using LB's health information without her consent, and whether the information provided was accurate. LB argued that the health service improperly obtained and used her health information and that it was inaccurate. The defendant, on the other hand, contended that the information was obtained lawfully and that it was accurate.
The Tribunal considered the Health Privacy Principle 2.1, which states that an agency must not collect personal information unless the collection is reasonably necessary for a function or activity of the agency and the individual has been given the opportunity to provide the information. The Tribunal found that the defendant had not breached this principle as the information was obtained in the course of providing a service to LB's former partner, and it was reasonable for the information to be collected in this context. The Tribunal also determined that the information was accurate as it was consistent with the medical records provided by LB's former partner. The Tribunal concluded that the defendant did not breach the privacy principle and dismissed the complaint.
No action was ordered to be taken by the Tribunal.
The legal issues before the Tribunal were whether the defendant breached the health privacy principle by collecting and using LB's health information without her consent, and whether the information provided was accurate. LB argued that the health service improperly obtained and used her health information and that it was inaccurate. The defendant, on the other hand, contended that the information was obtained lawfully and that it was accurate.
The Tribunal considered the Health Privacy Principle 2.1, which states that an agency must not collect personal information unless the collection is reasonably necessary for a function or activity of the agency and the individual has been given the opportunity to provide the information. The Tribunal found that the defendant had not breached this principle as the information was obtained in the course of providing a service to LB's former partner, and it was reasonable for the information to be collected in this context. The Tribunal also determined that the information was accurate as it was consistent with the medical records provided by LB's former partner. The Tribunal concluded that the defendant did not breach the privacy principle and dismissed the complaint.
No action was ordered to be taken by the Tribunal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Privacy Law
Legal Concepts
-
Collection and Accuracy of Health Information
-
Unsolicited Health Information
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Freelancer International Pty Ltd and Australian Information Commissioner [2017] AATA 2426
Cases Citing This Decision
10
Black v Hunter New England Health Service
[2010] NSWSC 1252
All v Sydney Local Health District
[2014] NSWCATAD 4
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
4
LB v Hunter New England Area Health Service
[2009] NSWADT 132
Vice-Chancellor, Macquarie University v FM (GD)
[2003] NSWADTAP 43
OA v New South Wales Department of Housing
[2005] NSWADT 233