LAWRENCE BRENNAN & BARHEN (Residential Tenancies)
[2011] ACAT 74
•31 October 2011
ACT CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
LAWRENCE BRENNAN & BARHEN (Residential Tenancies) [2011] ACAT 74
RT 647 of 2011
Catchwords: RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES – cost order – cost of subpoenaing witnesses
List of Legislation: ACT Civil & Administrative Tribunal Act 2008, s 48
List of cases: Perpetual Trustees (Canberra) Ltd v Young [2005] ACTRTT 5
Tribunal: Ms J. Lennard, Senior Member
Date of Orders: 31 October 2011
Date of Reasons for Decision: 3 November 2011
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY )
CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ) RT 647 of 2011
BETWEEN:
Godfrey Lawrence & Elizabeth Brennan
GODFREY LAWRENCE AND
ELIZABETH BRENNAN
Applicant
AND:
AVNER BARHEN
Respondent
TRIBUNAL: Ms J. Lennard, Senior Member
DATE: 3 November 2011
ORDER
1.The Applicant pay to the Respondent the amount of $72.00 being costs incurred in the matter, within 24 days of the date of this order.
………………………………..
Ms J Lennard
Senior Member
REASONS FOR DECISION
On 26 August 2011 ACAT made a decision in favour of the Respondent.
ACAT allowed parties 28 days to file submissions as to costs.
The Respondent filed brief submissions and asked for costs of $72, being the costs of subpoenaing witnesses. The respondent relied upon Perpetual Trustees (Canberra) Ltd v Young [2005] ACTRTT 5 (13 April 2005). The Applicant was served with a copy of the Respondent’s submissions, but made no submissions as to costs.
The ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008 provides at s48:
(1) The parties to an application must bear their own costs unless this Act otherwise provides or the tribunal otherwise orders.
(2) However—
(a) if the tribunal decides an application in favour of the
applicant—the tribunal may order the other party to pay the
applicant the filing fee for the application; or(b) if the tribunal considers that a party to an application caused
unreasonable delay or obstruction before or while the tribunal
was dealing with the application—the tribunal may order the
party to pay the reasonable costs of the other party arising from
the delay or obstruction; ...ACAT notes that the Respondent incurred the cost of the subpoenas of the two witnesses.
………………………………..
Ms J. Lennard
Senior Member
0
0
0