Blair v Blair
[2012] NZHC 2957
Citation 1
…s been satisfied and, where relevant, bringing into consideration the testator’s moral obligation to the claimant.”[42] [41] [2004] 10 VR 69 [42] at 76…
White v Barron
[1980] HCA 14
Citation 2
…d children had he been fully aware of all the relevant circumstances.”[47] [46] [1922] NZLR 218 [47] 220. I was also referred to White v Barron (1980) 144 CLR 431, per Stephen J, at 440; Collicoat v McMillan [1999] 3 VR 803, per Ormiston J, at 818-819…
Lieberman v Morris
[1944] HCA 13
Citation 3
…[21] (1944) 69 CLR 69 [22] 85-86…
Herszlikowicz v Czarny
[2005] VSC 354
Citation 4
…a claimant with a pension.[30] However, Hargrave J did not make any observations contrary to what was said in the authorities referred to above. [29] [2005] VSC 354 [30] paragraph 144 47 In Ross v Ross; McLean v Ross ,[31] Ashley J observed that the fact that a claimant is in receipt of a pension can be taken int…
Ross v Ross
[2002] VSC 544
Citation 5
…ant is in receipt of a pension can be taken into account, but he added, with the qualification clearly stated by Hedigan J in King v White .[32] [31] [2002] VSC 544 [32] ( supra ), at paragraph 44. In the footnote accompanying that observation, Ashley J specifically referred to pages 422 and 424 of the judgment o…
Coller v Coller
[1998] VSC 80
Citation 6
…y case, this issue has been partly addressed in relation to the possible provision of an additional source of income for the widow.[24] [23] [1992] 2 VR 417 [24] at 424…