Law Reform (Misrepresentation) Act 1977 (ACT)
Law Reform (Misrepresentation) Act 1977 No 13 (repealed)
Republication No 4
Effective: 2 November 2002
Republication date: 4 November 2002
As repealed by Act 2002 No 40
Unauthorised version prepared by ACT Parliamentary Counsel’s Office
About this republication
The republished law
This is a republication of the Law Reform (Misrepresentation) Act 1977 (repealed) (including any amendment made under the Legislation Act 2001, part 11.3 (Editorial changes)). It also includes any commencement, amendment, repeal or expiry affecting the republished law to 2 November 2002.
The legislation history and amendment history of the republished law are set out in endnotes 3 and 4.
Kinds of republications
The Parliamentary Counsel’s Office prepares 2 kinds of republications of ACT laws (see the ACT legislation register at type="disc">
authorised republications to which the Legislation Act 2001 applies
unauthorised republications.
The status of this republication appears on the bottom of each page.
Editorial changes
The Legislation Act 2001, part 11.3 authorises the Parliamentary Counsel to make editorial amendments and other changes of a formal nature when preparing a law for republication. Editorial changes do not change the effect of the law, but have effect as if they had been made by an Act commencing on the republication date (see Legislation Act 2001, s 115 and s 117). The changes are made if the Parliamentary Counsel considers they are desirable to bring the law into line, or more closely into line, with current legislative drafting practice.
When preparing the authorised version of this republication amendments were not made under part 11.3 (see endnote 1).
Uncommenced provisions and amendments
If a provision of the republished law has not commenced or is affected by an uncommenced amendment, the symbol U appears immediately before the provision heading. The text of the uncommenced provision or amendment appears only in the last endnote.
Modifications
If a provision of the republished law is affected by a current modification, the symbol M appears immediately before the provision heading. The text of the modifying provision appears in the endnotes. For the legal status of modifications, see Legislation Act 2001, section 95.
Penalties
The value of a penalty unit for an offence against this republished law at the republication date is—
(a)if the person charged is an individual—$100; or
(b)if the person charged is a corporation—$500.
Law Reform (Misrepresentation) Act 1977 (repealed)
Contents
Page
Name of Act 2
Meaning of court 2
Removal of certain bars to rescission 2
Damages for misrepresentation 2
Damages instead of rescission 3
Exclusion clauses 4
Misrepresentation in trade or commerce an offence 4
Negligent misrepresentation 5
Presumption in certain cases 5
Application 6
Endnotes
About the endnotes 7
Abbreviation key 7
Legislation history 8
Amendment history 8
Earlier republications 9
Law Reform (Misrepresentation) Act 1977 (repealed)
An Act to amend the law relating to misrepresentation
Name of Act
This Act is the Law Reform (Misrepresentation) Act 1977.
Meaning of court
In this Act:
NoteA definition applies except so far as the contrary intention appears (see Legislation Act 2001, s 155).
court includes an arbitrator.
Removal of certain bars to rescission
If a person has entered into a contract after a misrepresentation has been made to the person, the person shall, if otherwise the person would be entitled to rescind the contract without alleging fraud, be entitled, subject to this Act, to rescind the contract notwithstanding that—
(a)the misrepresentation has become a term of the contract; or
(b)the contract has been exercised; or
(c)a conveyance, transfer or other document has been registered under a law of a State or Territory as a result of the contract.
Damages for misrepresentation
If a person enters into a contract after a misrepresentation has been made to the person by—
(a)another party to the contract; or
(b)a person acting for, or on behalf of, another party to the contract; or
(c)a person who receives any direct or indirect material advantage as a result of the formation of the contract;
and as a result of so entering into the contract the person suffers loss, any person (whether or not he or she is the person by whom the misrepresentation is made) who would be liable for damages in tort in relation to the loss had the misrepresentation been made fraudulently, shall, subject to this section, be so liable, notwithstanding that the misrepresentation was not made fraudulently.
It is a defence to an action under subsection (1) that—
(a)if the representation was made by the defendant—the defendant had reasonable grounds for believing, and did believe up to the time the contract was made, that the representation was true; and
(b)if the representation was made by a person acting for or on behalf of the defendant—both the defendant and that person had reasonable grounds for believing, and did believe up to the time the contract was made, that the representation was true.
Damages instead of rescission
If in proceedings arising out of a contract it is proved that a person has rescinded, or is entitled to rescind, the contract on the ground of misrepresentation other than fraudulent misrepresentation, the court, after consideration of the consequences of the rescission, and the consequences of a declaration under this subsection, in the circumstances of the case, may, if it considers it just and equitable to do so, declare the contract to be subsisting and award the damages it considers fair and reasonable.
Damages may be awarded against a person under subsection (1) whether or not the person is liable for damages under section 4 (1) but—
(a)a court shall, in assessing damages under a provision of section 4 or this section, take into account any award of damages under this section or section 4, as the case requires, or of damages or compensation under any other law; and
(b)in assessing damages or compensation in proceedings under any other law relating to a contract, the court shall take into account any award of damages under this Act.
Exclusion clauses
If an agreement contains a provision that would exclude or restrict—
(a)any liability to which a party to a contract may be subject because of a misrepresentation made by the party before the contract was made; or
(b)any remedy available to another party to the contract because of such a misrepresentation;
that provision shall be of no effect except to the extent (if any) to which, in any proceedings arising out of the contract, the court may allow reliance on it as being fair and reasonable in the circumstances of the case.
Misrepresentation in trade or commerce an offence
If in the course of trade or commerce a person makes a misrepresentation—
(a)for the purpose of causing or inducing another person to enter into a contract; or
(b)for the purpose of causing or inducing another person to pay any pecuniary amount, or to make over or transfer any real or personal property, to the person by whom the misrepresentation is made or to any other person;
the person by whom the misrepresentation is made commits an offence against this Act.
Maximum penalty: 200 penalty units.
It is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against this section that the person by whom the representation was made believed on reasonable grounds that the representation was true.
Negligent misrepresentation
If the misrepresentation referred to in section 7 (1) is made—
(a)by a person acting in the course of his or her employment—his or her employer; or
(b)by a person duly authorised to act on behalf of another person—that other person;
commits of an offence against this Act.
Maximum penalty: 200 penalty units.
It is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against this section that—
(a)the defendant took reasonable precautions to prevent the commission of offences against this section by persons acting on behalf or in his or her employment; or
(b)that the defendant did not know, and could not reasonably be expected to have known, that the representation was made or that it was untrue.
Presumption in certain cases
If in proceedings under section 7 or 8 it is proved that a misrepresentation in fact acted as a material inducement to a person—
(a)to enter into a contract; or
(b)to pay any pecuniary amount, or to make over or transfer any real or personal property, to the person by whom the misrepresentation was made, or to any other person;
and that, in consequence, the person by whom the misrepresentation was made derived any direct or indirect material advantage, it shall be presumed, unless the contrary is otherwise established, that the misrepresentation was made for the purpose of inducing the person to whom it was made to enter into that contract, to pay that pecuniary amount, or to make over or transfer that property, as the case requires.
A person convicted of an offence against section 7 or 8 is not liable to prosecution under another Territory law for an offence arising out of the same facts.
Application
Nothing in this Act applies to or in relation to a misrepresentation, or an agreement, made before the commencement of this Act.
Endnotes
About the endnotes
Amending and modifying laws are annotated in the legislation history and the amendment history. Current modifications are not included in the republished law but are set out in the endnotes.
Not all editorial amendments made under the Legislation Act 2001, part 11.3 are annotated in the amendment history. Full details of any amendments can be obtained from the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office.
Uncommenced amending laws and expiries are listed in the legislation history and the amendment history. These details are underlined. Uncommenced provisions and amendments are not included in the republished law but are set out in the last endnote.
If all the provisions of the law have been renumbered, a table of renumbered provisions gives details of previous and current numbering.
The endnotes also include a table of earlier republications.
If the republished law includes penalties, current information about penalty unit values appears on the republication inside front cover.
Abbreviation key
am = amended ord = ordinance amdt = amendment orig = original ch = chapter p = page cl = clause par = paragraph def = definition pres = present dict = dictionary prev = previous disallowed = disallowed by the Legislative (prev...) = previously Assembly prov = provision div = division pt = part exp = expires/expired r = rule/subrule Gaz = Gazette reg = regulation/subregulation hdg = heading renum = renumbered IA = Interpretation Act 1967 reloc = relocated ins = inserted/added R[X] = Republication No LA = Legislation Act 2001 RI = reissue LR = legislation register s = section/subsection LRA = Legislation (Republication) Act 1996 sch = schedule mod = modified / modification sdiv = subdivision No = number sub = substituted num = numbered SL = Subordinate Law o = order underlining = whole or part not commenced om = omitted/repealed or to be expired
Legislation history
This Act was originally a Commonwealth ordinance—the Law Reform (Misrepresentation) Ordinance 1977 No 13 (Cwlth).
The Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 (Cwlth), s 34 (4) converted most former Commonwealth ordinances in force in the ACT into ACT enactments. This allowed the ACT Legislative Assembly to amend and repeal the laws. This Act was converted into an ACT enactment on 11 May 1989 (self-government day).
As with most ordinances in force in the ACT, the name was changed from Ordinance to Act by the Self-Government (Citation of Laws) Act 1989 No 21, s 5 on 11 May 1989 (self-government day).
Before 11 May 1989, ordinances commenced on their notification day unless otherwise stated (see Seat of Government (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12).
Legislation before becoming Territory enactment
Law Reform (Misrepresentation) Act 1977 No 13
notified 30 May 1977
commenced 30 May 1977as amended by
Legislation after becoming Territory enactment
Statute Law Revision (Penalties) Act 1994 No 81 sch
notified 29 November 1994 (Gaz 1994 No S253)
s 1, s 2 commenced 29 November 1994 (s 2 (1))
sch commenced 29 November 1994 (s 2 (2) and Gaz 1994 No S269)as repealed by
Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 sch 3, pt 3.1
notified LR 10 October 2002
s 1, s 2 commenced 10 October 2002 (LA s 75 (1))
sch 3, pt 3.1 commenced 1 November 2002 (s 2 (2) and CN2002‑13)Amendment history
Misrepresentation in trade or commerce an offence
s 7am 1994 No 81 sch
Negligent misrepresentation
s 8am 1994 No 81 sch
Earlier republications
Some earlier republications were not numbered. The number in column 1 refers to the publication order.
Since 12 September 2001 every authorised republication has been published in electronic pdf format on the ACT legislation register. A selection of authorised republications have also been published in printed format. These republications are marked with an asterisk (*) in column 1. Except for the footer, electronic and printed versions of an authorised republication are identical.
Republication No
Amendments to
Republication date
1 not amended 31 October 1990 2 not amended 31 October 1993 3 Act 1994 No 81 31 July 2002
Unauthorised version prepared by ACT Parliamentary Counsel's Office
© Australian Capital Territory 2002
0
0
0