Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Wednesday 7 October 2021

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, WEDNESDAY 7 OCTOBER 2021

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 10:30a.m.For Hearing Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Cheryl Ann Kendall

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:00pm
For Sentence
Emma-Lisa Eronen

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
For Trial
MJD

4.00pm
For Mention
MJD

4.15pm
For Sentence
Oscar Jyles Dyett
4.15pm
For Sentencing Submissions
Joshua Edward Peter Darling

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Acting Justice MARSHALLCriminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m. via MS Teams
For Security for Costs
Andrew John SCOTT as trustee of the estate of the late Peter Pittiglio v Dean Marcus PITTIGLIO

12:30p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Tracy Lee BRANDIS-GRAY v Amanda YOUNG and anor

2:15p.m.
For Hearing
TPT Wealth Limited v Martina McPEACE

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Director of Public Prosecutions v Cheryl Ann Kendall was heard by Justice Pearce of the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The defendant, Cheryl Ann Kendall, faced charges related to criminal activity, and the Director of Public Prosecutions sought to prosecute her. The court was tasked with determining the validity of the charges against Kendall and whether they were supported by sufficient evidence.

The legal issues before the court included the admissibility of certain evidence and the interpretation of specific statutory provisions relevant to the charges. The court had to consider whether the evidence presented was relevant, reliable, and whether it adhered to the principles of natural justice. Additionally, the court examined whether the prosecution had established the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Justice Pearce meticulously reviewed the evidence and legal arguments presented. The court concluded that the evidence was robust and appropriately gathered, thereby upholding the prosecution's case. The court found Kendall guilty on all charges and set out the sentencing considerations for the defendant. The final orders of the court mandated that the defendant would be sentenced in due course, with specific considerations given to the nature and circumstances of the offence.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established