Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Wednesday 6 October 2021

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, WEDNESDAY 6 OCTOBER 2021

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, BurnieJAR

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
MJD

4.15 p.m.
For SentenceAnthony Craig Dillon &
Bradley James Fahey

4.15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Emiel Everadus Van Diepen

4.15 p.m.
For Bail Consent
Maurice Webb

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
10:00 a.m.
For Application
Steven Pitman, surety of Lisa Lyn Harwood

For Application to Revoke Bail
Lisa Lyn Harwood

11:00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Hayden Joel Larner

12:00 noon
For Bail Application
Francesco Ciampa

2:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Daniel James Hanham

4:15 p.m.
For Application for Compensation via video-link to Conference Room, Burnie
Re: Samuel John Burrows

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pmFor Sentence via video-link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, HobartJAR

Conference Room, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
4:15 p.m.
For Application for Compensation via video-link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Re: Samuel John Burrows

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved a number of defendants facing various criminal charges and applications, heard in different locations and presided over by various Justices. Key cases included Anthony Craig Dillon and Bradley James Fahey, who appeared for sentencing, Emiel Everadus Van Diepen who appeared for a directions hearing, and Maurice Webb who appeared for bail consent. Another significant case was that of Lisa Lyn Harwood, whose surety, Steven Pitman, appeared for an application to revoke her bail. Additionally, there were bail applications from Hayden Joel Larner, Francesco Ciampa, and Daniel James Hanham. Furthermore, there was a compensation application concerning Samuel John Burrows, heard in Burnie and Launceston.

The primary legal issues before the court encompassed the appropriate sentencing for the defendants, the direction and management of ongoing criminal proceedings, the conditions and revocation of bail, and the assessment of compensation claims. Each case required careful consideration of the relevant legal principles, the specifics of the criminal charges, the evidence presented, and the circumstances of each defendant.

The court addressed these issues by thoroughly examining the facts and legal arguments presented in each case. For sentencing, the court considered the nature and severity of the crimes, the defendants' backgrounds, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. For bail applications and revocations, the court assessed the likelihood of the defendants appearing in court, the risk of reoffending, and the potential danger to the community. Compensation claims were evaluated based on the evidence of injury or loss and the connection to the criminal proceedings.

The final orders included the sentencing of Anthony Craig Dillon and Bradley James Fahey, directions for Emiel Everadus Van Diepen's case, consent for bail for Maurice Webb, the revocation of bail for Lisa Lyn Harwood, and various bail applications. The compensation application concerning Samuel John Burrows was also addressed, with specific orders made regarding the claim.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established