Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday 4 September 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY 4 SEPTEMBER 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
MDR

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Disputed Facts Hearing

Timothy Lee King
Braedon Isaac Males

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial
Dion Brian Lumley
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
For Hearing
Robert Frank Nightingale and anor
v
Recorder of Titles

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Civil Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
James MP Fitzgerald
v
Constable Alisha Barnes

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial
TJL

To Follow
For Mention
James Peter Sampson

2:15pm For Mention

A Witness

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Chief Justice BLOW

Wednesday 5^th September 2018

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Trial
(Part-heard)
KJW

4:15 p.m.
For Plea
Bradley John Upton

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the case of Dion Brian Lumley was heard before Justice Brett. Lumley was engaged in a civil dispute, and the matter was before the court for a hearing concerning disputed facts. The nature of the dispute involved specific issues that required judicial determination, focusing on the factual disagreements between the parties.

The legal issues before the court centred on the interpretation and application of the relevant laws to the facts as presented. Justice Brett needed to determine how the law applied to the specific circumstances of the case and whether the evidence supported the claims made by Lumley. The court had to assess the credibility and weight of the evidence provided and decide on the factual matters in dispute.

Justice Brett, after considering the evidence and arguments presented, reached a decision on the disputed facts. The court found in favour of Lumley on certain points and against him on others, providing a detailed explanation of the reasoning behind the conclusions reached. The outcome was based on a careful analysis of the law and the factual evidence, ensuring that the decision was fair and just according to the legal principles applicable to the case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established