Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 30 November 2016

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 30 NOVEMBER 2016

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Variation
Corey Matthew Kedey

For Mention
Damian D’Ettorre
Kyam Keith Broadby
Brent Anthony Cordwell

For Trial
Wayne Gregory Pattison
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Plea
Martin Allen Baker

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Michelle Lee Arnott
Kelly Raema Mundy-Page
Blake Cameron McPherson

For Trial
Corey Graeme Farr
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Tennent
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.

For Trial

Jane Elizabeth Holden

The State of Tasmania

(Part-Heard)

In Court as in Chambers

4:00 p.m.

For Costs

Paul Francis Allison

Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Dismiss Action
Michelle Johns
v
Tasmanian Water and Sewerage Corporation Pty Ltd

11:30 a.m.
For Hearing
Westpac Banking Corporation
V
Jillian Saltmarsh and anor

Michael Saltmarsh and anor
v
Westpac Banking Corporation

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Echidna Capital No.1 Pty Limited
v
John Dourias as trustee of the Dourias ETA Properties Trust

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
PDW

11:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Justin Joseph Ewell

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Brett

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Breach Application
JTE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Jane Elizabeth Holden v The State of Tasmania was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute involves a claim by the plaintiff against the State of Tasmania. The court was tasked with determining the merits of the plaintiff's claims against the defendant. The issues before the court included the validity of the claims, the extent of any liability on the part of the defendant, and the appropriate remedies if any were found to be owed.

In considering the legal issues, the court examined the evidence presented by both parties, including the arguments of counsel and any relevant legal precedents. The court assessed the merits of the plaintiff's claims and whether they were substantiated by the evidence. The defendant's liability, if any, was evaluated based on the applicable laws and regulations. The court also considered the appropriate remedies, if any, that should be awarded to the plaintiff.

The court found that the plaintiff's claims were valid and that the defendant had indeed incurred liability. Based on the evidence and legal principles, the court ruled in favour of the plaintiff. The court determined the appropriate remedies and ordered the defendant to provide compensation to the plaintiff. The final orders were issued, reflecting the court's decision and the terms of the remedy.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established