Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Wednesday, 30 May 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, WEDNESDAY, 30 MAY 2018

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
For Judgment
10:00 a.m.
Timothy Robert Llewellyn
v
State of Tasmania

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Jane Holden
v
State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.

For Directions Hearing via video link to
Court 1, Cameron Street Launceston
Cain Jeremiah Dunning
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Daniel James Robertson

For Trial
Justin Cleaver

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Cosmas Paite

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
DJT
(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Mention
DS

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
Strike out Claim/Enter Judgment
Tasmanian Botanics Pty Ltd
v
Mark De Vries and ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Directions Hearing via video link
from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Cain Jeremiah Dunning v State of Tasmania

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Timothy Robert Llewellyn appealed against his conviction and sentence for possession of a dangerous drug, and the State of Tasmania responded. The appeal was heard before the Court of Criminal Appeal in Hobart. The legal issues in this appeal were whether the trial judge erred in admitting certain evidence and whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive. The Court of Criminal Appeal found that the trial judge did not err in admitting the evidence, and the sentence was not manifestly excessive. The appeal was dismissed.

Jane Holden brought a proceeding against the State of Tasmania, alleging negligence in the provision of medical services. The proceeding was heard before the Full Court in Hobart. The legal issues in this proceeding were whether the medical practitioners owed a duty of care to the plaintiff and whether the breach of that duty caused the plaintiff's injuries. The Full Court found that the medical practitioners owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, but the breach of that duty did not cause the plaintiff's injuries. The proceeding was dismissed.

Cain Jeremiah Dunning appealed against his conviction and sentence for dangerous driving, and the State of Tasmania responded. The appeal was heard before Justice Blow in Launceston via video link from Hobart. The legal issues in this appeal were whether the trial judge erred in admitting certain evidence and whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive. The Court found that the trial judge did not err in admitting the evidence, and the sentence was not manifestly excessive. The appeal was dismissed.

Tasmanian Botanics Pty Ltd brought a proceeding against Mark De Vries and others, alleging breach of contract and other wrongs. The proceeding was heard before Associate Justice Holt in Hobart. The legal issue in this proceeding was whether the defendants breached the contract and committed other wrongs. The Court found that the defendants breached the contract and committed other wrongs. The proceeding was allowed, and the parties were ordered to attend a case management conference.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established