Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 3 May 2017

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 3 MAY 2017

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention

Lewan Patrick Lehman

For Trial
Darren James Barwick
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Application for Breach of Suspended Sentence
Justin Kevin Pearce

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Trial
CGS
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
DJK
Dean Richard Fitzpatrick

For Bail Application
Joshua Burnett

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Application to Breach a Community Service Order
Julie Louise Rowbottom

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence
Dee-Jay Feil
William Henry Richardson

4:15 p.m.
For Mention
Jacki Gail Drew

For Sentence
Jacob Ivan Davis

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Injunction
ACN 125 152 310 Pty Ltd and anor
v
Renjith Joseph and ors

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Jason Reid
v
Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Michael James Beames

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention by Video Link
Brady Christopher Oates

For Trial
Kristy Jayne Grant
Dean Troy Wylie
Marlon Castanares Laguador
(Part Heard)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved the Supreme Court of Tasmania, where various criminal and civil matters were listed for hearing. The criminal cases included trials, mentions, and applications for breach of suspended sentences, bail, and community service orders. Notable cases included those of Lewan Patrick Lehman, Darren James Barwick, Justin Kevin Pearce, Joshua Burnett, and Julie Louise Rowbottom. In civil matters, ACN 125 152 310 Pty Ltd and Renjith Joseph, along with others, were involved in an injunction case, and Jason Reid had a directions hearing by telephone against Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd. Additionally, there were criminal cases in Launceston and Burnie.

The legal issues that the court had to address encompassed a range of criminal proceedings such as the consideration of bail applications, the sentencing of individuals, and the handling of breaches of suspended sentences and community service orders. The civil case involved an injunction and a directions hearing by telephone. These matters required the court to interpret and apply relevant statutes and case law, and to make decisions based on the evidence presented.

The court's reasoning and outcome would have depended on the specifics of each case. In criminal matters, the court needed to consider the nature of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, the circumstances of the offence, and the impact of the sentence on the community and the victim. For the civil injunction case, the court would have examined the merits of the injunction application and the likelihood of harm if the injunction were not granted. The outcomes would have been determined by the evidence and arguments presented by the parties involved.

The final orders would have varied depending on the outcome of the court's deliberations in each case. In criminal cases, this could include sentences, the granting or refusal of bail, or the imposition of community service orders. In the civil case, the court might have granted or refused the injunction, or it might have ordered further submissions or hearings.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established