Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 3 March 2021

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 3 MARCH 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m
For Hearing
Susan Blyth Neill-Fraser v State of Tasmania(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the CRIMINAL COURT OF APPEAL
10:00a.m
Mark Anthony Bell
v
The State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Decision via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd v Parliament Square Hobart Landowner Pty Ltd

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Legal Argument
Matthew John Davey

2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Sean Andrew Hall
ATR

For Sentence and Bail Application
Jmarli Rex Burgess

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice Martin
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Application to Vary Bail
Daniel Nicky Smith

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence
MLVT
Joshua Michael Murtagh

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m.
For Hearing via MS TEAMS
River Street Tas Pty Ltd v Australian Securities
and Investments Commission

2:15p.m.
For Hearing via MS TEAMS
Chamber Matter

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Mark Richard Nicholas

For Trial
KJB

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Decision via video link Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd v Parliament Square Hobart Landowner Pty Ltd

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd v Parliament Square Hobart Landowner Pty Ltd was heard by Justice Geasor in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The matter pertains to a dispute over land ownership and the interpretation of a contract between the parties. The plaintiff, Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd, claims ownership of certain land in Hobart, which the defendant, Parliament Square Hobart Landowner Pty Ltd, disputes. The case involves complex issues of contract law and property rights, with the court required to determine the validity and interpretation of the contract between the parties.

The court was required to address several legal issues, including the validity of the contract, the interpretation of specific clauses within the contract, and the rights and obligations of the parties under the agreement. The central issue was whether the contract was valid and enforceable, and if so, what the terms of the contract entailed. The court also had to consider whether any breaches of contract had occurred and, if so, what remedies were available to the parties.

Justice Geasor, in delivering the judgment, thoroughly examined the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The court found that the contract was valid and enforceable, with specific clauses clearly outlining the rights and obligations of both parties. The court ruled in favour of the plaintiff, Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd, and found that the defendant had breached certain terms of the contract. As a result, the court ordered the defendant to pay damages to the plaintiff for the breach. Additionally, the court clarified the terms of the contract, ensuring both parties understood their respective obligations moving forward.

The final orders of the court included a determination of the contract's validity, an award of damages to the plaintiff for the breach, and a clarification of the contractual terms. The court's decision provided a clear resolution to the dispute, ensuring that both parties understood their rights and obligations under the contract.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established