Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 29 November 2017

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 29 NOVEMBER 2017

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
RWG
(Part Heart)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Christopher John Brown

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst
Christopher Adam Leaman
Adam Arnold Jones
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Sheldon Bruce McCulloch

For Trial
Glenn John McKeown
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Mention by video link
Paul Wayne Simpson

For Directions Hearing by video link to
Court 2, Cameron Street Launceston
Matthew John Upston
v
State of Tasmania

For Bail Application
Justin Craig Cleaver
Zach James Muir-Bennett

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Strike out Statement of Claim
MLW Holdings II Pty Ltd
v
Tasbuild Limited

4:30 a.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Brennan Reeves & Isobel Reeves as
trustees for the B & I Reeves Family Trust
v
Medesse Pty Ltd

4:45 p.m.
For Mention by Telephone
Christopher Benson and ors
v
Deloraine Pty Ltd and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Kerry Alexander Bilston

4:15pm For Bail Consent
Michael Rennie

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Caine Robert Richardson

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15pm For Directions Hearing by video link
From Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Matthew John Upston v State of Tasmania

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Wood

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Mention
Guy John Lorenz
Scott Phillip Strahan
RNS

For Trial
Daniel Tasman Mark
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Mention via video link
Darren Ward Gale

For Sentence
Justin Lee Frake

For Application to Vary Bail
Paul James Abraham

For Bail Application
RJH
(Part-Heard)

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This summary pertains to court proceedings in Tasmania on 29 November 2017. The case details include various criminal and civil matters heard across multiple courts and judges in Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. The Supreme Court of Tasmania had several criminal trials and bail applications, while the Civil Jurisdiction dealt with a strike out application and a directions hearing. Additionally, the Magistrates Court had its own list of cases to be heard.

The legal issues in these proceedings varied, encompassing criminal trials for offences such as theft and drug-related activities, bail applications, and civil disputes including a strike out application and a directions hearing. The criminal cases involved defendants facing charges that required the court to consider evidence and legal arguments to determine guilt or innocence. The bail applications necessitated the court to assess the risk of flight, likelihood of reoffending, and the interests of justice. Civil cases involved procedural matters such as the validity of claims and the progress of litigation.

The reasoning and outcomes of these cases were not detailed in the extract. However, the nature of the court proceedings suggests that the judges would have considered statutory provisions, case law, and the specifics of each case. Decisions would have been made based on the merits of the evidence and arguments presented, following legal principles applicable to criminal and civil law in Australia.

The final orders of the court were not specified in the extract. Typically, these would include decisions on guilt or acquittal in criminal cases, bail conditions or refusals, and procedural rulings in civil cases. Each decision would be communicated to the parties involved in the respective proceedings.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established