LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 29 AUGUST 2018
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Court of Criminal Appeal
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Jarrett Duane Gregson
v
State of Tasmania
To follow
MAC
v
State of Tasmania
In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Norman Edward Ohl
v
State of Tasmania
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:45 p.m.
For Bail Application
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:00 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to
Court 2, Alexander Street, Burnie
Jessica Chloe Richards
2:15 p.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
via video link
GLF
(Part-Heard)
For Bail Application
Rhett Williams
3:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Eleni Koulmandas
(Part-heard)
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Bail Application
Nicholas John Barrett
(Part-Heard)
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Kelly Lee Cubit
Robert George Greig
LAUNCESTON
NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON
BURNIE
Court 2, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:00 p.m.
For Sentence via video link from
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jessica Chloe Richards
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 29 August 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 495
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 495
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court encompassed a range of criminal proceedings, from bail applications to sentencing submissions. For instance, the court had to consider the merits of releasing individuals on bail, assessing factors such as the likelihood of the accused appearing in court, the seriousness of the offence, and any risk to the community. In sentencing cases, the court needed to determine the appropriate punishment based on the nature of the crime, the offender's criminal history, and other relevant factors. The court also needed to address preliminary proceedings and ensure that all legal standards were upheld during the judicial process.
The reasoning and outcome of the cases varied based on the specific circumstances presented. For bail applications, the court examined the risk versus the rights of the accused. Where the risk to the community was deemed high, bail was often denied. In sentencing, the court considered mitigating and aggravating factors to ensure that the punishment was proportionate to the offence. The court's decisions were grounded in legal precedents and aimed to balance the rights of the accused with the need to protect the community. The final orders, where specified, included granting or denying bail, setting bail conditions, and determining sentences that reflected the court's assessment of each case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.