Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday 27 November 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 210


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY 27 NOVEMBER 2019

HOBART

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Application to Stay Proceedings
Peter John O’Neill

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Damian Leslie Harper

For Mention via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Damir Huskic

For Sentence
James Stephen William Russon

For Directions Hearing
Jackson Maxwell Carn

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Kraig Anthony Dann v
Port Sorell Bowls Club Inc
(Part-heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Michael David Maple

4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Scott Gary Michael Cook

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
David William Michaelson

For Trial (part-heard)
Terrence James Burn
Ned Phillip Lang

2:15p.m.
For Bail Application (part-heard)
Jake Mark Pearce

3:00p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Benjamin Ronald Stirling

4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
Matthew John Davey

For Bail Application (part-heard)
Kayne Geoffrey Quinn

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
RUB
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial (part heard)
Jacob Adam Williams
Marcus John Williams

To Follow
For Bail Application and Directions Hearing via Video Link
Luke Anthony Shaw

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Mention via video link from Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Damir Huskic

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday 27 November 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 210
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 210
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania had a busy schedule on Wednesday, 27 November 2019, with a variety of criminal and civil matters being heard across different courts and locations. In the criminal jurisdiction, several applications and hearings were scheduled, including an application to stay proceedings by Peter John O’Neill and a directions hearing for Damian Leslie Harper via video link from Risdon Prison Complex. Various bail applications, trials, and sentencing submissions were also on the agenda.

The legal issues before the court ranged from requests to stay proceedings and bail applications to trials and sentencing submissions. For instance, the court had to consider whether to grant a stay of proceedings in the case of Peter John O’Neill and determine the bail eligibility of several defendants. Additionally, the substantive criminal matters, such as the trial of Michael David Maple, required the court to weigh evidence, apply relevant legal principles, and deliver judgments on guilt and sentencing.

The court's reasoning and outcomes were not detailed in the provided extract. However, it is clear that the court had to carefully consider each case's unique circumstances, applying the relevant legal standards and procedures. The outcomes would have been communicated to the parties involved and documented in the court's records. Further details on the specific judgments and orders made by the court on that day would need to be obtained from the court's official records or subsequent legal communications.

No specific final orders were mentioned in the provided extract. The court would have made determinations on each matter heard, including decisions on applications to stay proceedings, bail applications, trials, and sentencing submissions. These orders would be communicated to the parties involved and documented in the court's records.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.