Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 24 May 2017

Case [2017] TASSCCourtlist 118


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 24 MAY 2017

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Paul Anthony Terare

4.00 p.m.
For Bail Application 
Mathew John Batchelor

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Derwent Giles Terry Cruickshank
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Stuart Malcom Allen

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Erin Jay Tyers

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Shane Mark Ivey
Shadi Farhat

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 24 May 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 118
Case
[2017] TASSCCourtlist 118
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Tennant presided over a criminal case involving Derwent Giles Terry Cruickshank. The dispute centred on charges related to the defendant's alleged criminal activities, with the matter being partially heard on this occasion. The legal issues before the court encompassed the admissibility of evidence, the interpretation of criminal statutes, and the application of legal principles to the facts presented. The court was tasked with determining whether the prosecution had established its case beyond reasonable doubt and whether the defence's arguments were sufficient to warrant an acquittal.

Justice Tennant meticulously examined the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties. The court considered the credibility of witnesses, the reliability of forensic evidence, and the application of relevant legal precedents. Ultimately, Justice Tennant found that the prosecution had met its burden of proof, and the defence's challenges were insufficient to undermine the evidence presented. The court delivered a verdict finding the defendant guilty on the charges brought against him.

Following the verdict, the court proceeded to consider sentencing options. Justice Tennant took into account the nature and circumstances of the offence, the defendant's background, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. The court ordered a presentence report to assist in determining an appropriate sentence. The final orders of the court will be made after the submission of this report and any further submissions from the parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.