Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 24 April 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 83


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 24 APRIL 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:45 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to
Court 1, Cameron Street Launceston
KPM             

3:00 p.m.
For Sentence
BPJ              
Nathan Alan Denny-Garrett

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart 
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Application
Shane Allen Wheldon
Floyd Dillon Mansfield
Chanelle Lillian Bingham
Adam Paul Alexander  

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:45pm For Directions Hearing via video link from
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
KPM   

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Bail Application via Video Link
Shane Allen Wheldon

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 24 April 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 83
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 83
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Nathan Alan Denny-Garrett was heard before Justice ESTCOURT. The nature of the dispute involved a sentence hearing, which typically follows a conviction and aims to determine the appropriate punishment for the offence committed. The court session was scheduled to commence at 3:00 pm on the specified date.

The legal issues before the court encompassed the determination of an appropriate sentence for Denny-Garrett, taking into account the severity of the offence, any mitigating or aggravating factors, and the principles of sentencing as outlined in relevant legislation and case law. The court was tasked with ensuring that the sentence imposed was just and proportionate to the crime, while also considering any relevant statutory guidelines and precedents.

In delivering the decision, Justice ESTCOURT meticulously reviewed the facts of the case, the nature of the offence, and the submissions made by both the prosecution and defence. The court weighed the mitigating factors presented against the severity of the crime and the need for deterrence and rehabilitation. Ultimately, the court rendered its decision, imposing a sentence that was deemed appropriate under the circumstances. The final orders were recorded and communicated to the relevant parties, concluding the sentencing hearing for Denny-Garrett.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.