LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, WEDNESDAY, 23 MAY 2018
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Glenn Andrew Wakefield
For Trial
Navin Nepal
(Part-Heard)
2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Lawrence Charles Kean
For Sentencing Submissions
Kristel Cee-Anne Cowen
4:15 p.m.
For Mention
Scott Raymond Dale
For Plea in Mitigation
Robert Michael Allen
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Michael William Triffitt
Joshua Blair Read
For Trial
DJT
(Part-Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
1:45 p.m.
For Judgment
Craig Anthony Vincent
v
Acting Sergeant Angela Robinson and anor
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Copper Mines of Tasmania Pty Ltd
v
Simon John Cooper
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Brocklands Pty Ltd
v
Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd
(Part-Heard)
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Directions Hearing
James Frederick Edward Slevin
Tina Maree Robertson
Dylan Mark Dennis Jenkins
Jonty Peter Smith
To Follow
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Rodney Eric Barker
Mark Anthony Carr
To Follow
For Plea
Jacob Scott Kevin Riley-McDonald
Gary Raymond Cooper
To Follow
For Bail Application
John Benjamin Adams
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Wednesday, 23 May 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 410
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 410
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues addressed in these cases ranged from bail applications and plea mitigations to sentencing submissions and trial mentions. The court's primary responsibility was to ensure that the due process was adhered to in each case, considering the specific legal and factual circumstances presented. This included evaluating the merits of bail applications, assessing the appropriate sentences for convicted individuals, and managing the procedural aspects of ongoing trials.
The court's reasoning and outcomes were not detailed in the provided text. However, it is understood that the proceedings followed the judicial standards and legal precedents applicable in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The court's decisions would have been based on the evidence presented, applicable laws, and the specific facts of each case. The final orders, if made, would have been communicated in the subsequent court filings or records.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.