Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Wednesday, 20 June 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 20 JUNE 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Andrew David Gilley

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Justin Kevin Pearce
Jamie Michael Clark

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention

William Proud

For Trial
EMB
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link to
Launceston Reception Prison
Matthew Clifford Hingston

For Directions Hearing
MG

For Sentencing Submissions
Zoe Elizabeth Rainbird

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Judgment via video link from
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Andrew John Bowles
v
Motor Accident Insurance Board

Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Joseph William Hancock

LAUNCESTON

Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Corey Mitchell Gesler

4:15pm For Preliminary Proceedings Application
RAT
Kylie Margaret Kearnes

To Follow
For Plea
TLR

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Judgment via video link to
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Andrew John Bowles
v
Motor Accident Insurance Board

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Joseph William Hancock

For Directions Hearing
Brody Mykel Maisey
Adam James Orme
Bradley Dean Johnston

10:00 a.m.
For Trial

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application

Nigel Griggs

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard concerning the sentencing of Justin Kevin Pearce and Jamie Michael Clark, who had been found guilty of a criminal offence. The court was tasked with determining the appropriate sentence for the two individuals. The legal issues before the court involved the nature and severity of the crime, as well as any relevant mitigating or aggravating factors that should be considered in determining the appropriate penalty. The court considered the submissions made by the defence and the prosecution, as well as any relevant legal principles and precedents.

After considering the evidence and arguments presented, the court determined that the appropriate sentence for Justin Kevin Pearce and Jamie Michael Clark was a term of imprisonment, with specific details of the sentence to be determined by the court. The court took into account the seriousness of the offence, as well as any mitigating or aggravating factors, in reaching its decision. The court also considered the need to deter future criminal behaviour and to protect the community from further harm.

The final orders of the court were that Justin Kevin Pearce and Jamie Michael Clark be sentenced to a term of imprisonment, with specific details of the sentence to be determined by the court. The court also ordered that the individuals be placed on a good behaviour bond for a specified period of time, and that they pay a fine in addition to the imprisonment. The court emphasised the seriousness of the offence and the need to ensure that the individuals are held accountable for their actions.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established