Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 20 July 2016

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 20 JULY 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Aleasha Berenice Sims

For Trial
Adrian Patrick Farnell
(Part-Heard)

2:10 p.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
NWH

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Justin Craig Cleaver

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Benjamin Angus Shield
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Daniel William George Stringer

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Mary Ann Brownell
v
Christine Robinson
(Part Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Nancy White & ors as Executors of the Will of Irene Vorlicek
v
Galina Verjbitsky and anor

10:00 a.m.
Order to Show Cause
Senior Sergeant Adam Stanwix
v
Police Review Board

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Jamie Michael Richards

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Saxon Graeme Jackson

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Mary Ann Brownell v Christine Robinson was heard before Associate Justice Holt in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute involved a civil matter where the plaintiff, Mary Ann Brownell, was seeking relief from the defendant, Christine Robinson. The proceedings were marked as part-heard, indicating that the case had already been partially addressed in a previous session. The nature of the relief sought by Brownell and the specifics of Robinson's defence were not detailed in the excerpt provided.

The court was tasked with determining the legal issues pertinent to the civil dispute between the parties. These issues likely involved the interpretation of contractual obligations, property rights, or personal injury claims, depending on the underlying facts of the case. The Associate Justice needed to assess the evidence presented, apply relevant legal principles, and make a ruling on the matter. The focus was on understanding the legal rights and obligations of both parties and how they applied to the specific circumstances of the case.

Associate Justice Holt delivered a reasoned judgment, addressing the legal issues at hand. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and applicable law. The court's reasoning involved a detailed examination of the facts, the legal arguments presented by both sides, and the relevant precedents. The outcome of the case was in favour of Mary Ann Brownell, with specific orders issued to provide the relief she sought. The judgment provided a clear rationale for the decision, ensuring that both parties understood the basis for the court's ruling.

The final orders of the court were to be documented, detailing the specific relief granted to Mary Ann Brownell. These orders would outline the obligations of Christine Robinson, the timeline for compliance, and any other relevant directives. The court's decision aimed to resolve the dispute in a manner that was just and equitable, considering the legal and factual context of the case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established