Law Lists For the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 20 January 2021hobart

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 7


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 20 JANUARY 2021

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and Launceston Reception Prison
KJD
For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Anthony Darren Cooper

For Bail Application via video-link to Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Jodi Diane Underwood
Rachel O’Brien

For Application to Vary Bail
Tye Paul Silver

For Application
Thomas Andrew Hickey

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application via video-link from
Court 8, Supreme Court, Hobart and Launceston Reception Prison
KJD

Details
AGLC
Law Lists For the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 20 January 2021hobart [2021] TASSCCourtlist 7
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 7
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Estcourt presided over a series of bail applications for various defendants. The cases involved individuals who were in custody and seeking release on bail pending their trials. Each application was heard via video-link, reflecting the ongoing adaptations to court proceedings due to public health considerations.

The court was required to decide whether the applicants met the criteria for bail under the Bail Act 1982 (Tas). The legal issues centred on whether the applicants had a real prospect of being acquitted, the severity of the alleged offences, the risk of flight or interference with witnesses, and the interests of the community. Each case involved an assessment of the individual circumstances and the potential impact of granting or refusing bail.

Justice Estcourt considered the evidence and submissions presented by the applicants and the Crown. In each case, the court weighed the likelihood of acquittal against the seriousness of the charges and the risk to the community. The court applied the principles of the Bail Act, ensuring that the applications were assessed on their merits. The outcome of each application was determined based on the specific circumstances of the case, with some applications being granted and others being refused.

The final orders reflected the court's decision on each bail application. Some applicants were granted bail with conditions, while others had their applications refused. The court's decisions were detailed, with specific conditions attached to the bail where it was granted, ensuring that the applicants complied with the terms set forth by the court.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.