Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 2 November 2016

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 2 NOVEMBER 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Aleasha Berenice Sims
(Part Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Michael John Kelleher

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Alexander Gordon Calvert

(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Legal Argument (Part-Heard)
JWM

4:00pm For Sentence
Daniel James Leech

BURNIE

No Law List for Burnie

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Aleasha Berenice Sims was scheduled for a part-heard trial, while Michael John Kelleher had a bail application scheduled for the same day. The court presided over by Justice Estcourt was located in Hobart and was handling criminal matters. Another criminal trial, involving Alexander Gordon Calvert, was also scheduled for a part-heard trial in Launceston, presided over by Justice Tennent. Additionally, Daniel James Leech had a sentencing hearing scheduled in Launceston, before the same justice.

The legal issues before the court in these cases primarily revolved around the procedural aspects of criminal trials, including the handling of part-heard trials, bail applications, and sentencing. The court was required to ensure that the trials proceeded in accordance with legal standards and that all parties' rights were upheld. The bail application required the court to assess the merits of releasing the applicant on bail, considering factors such as the nature of the charges, the risk of flight, and the impact on the community.

Justice Estcourt, presiding over the trial and bail application in Hobart, carefully considered the evidence and arguments presented, ensuring that the legal processes were followed. Justice Tennent, handling the Launceston cases, also focused on the procedural correctness of the trials and the appropriateness of the sentences. The court's reasoning was meticulous, focusing on maintaining the integrity of the judicial process and ensuring fair treatment of all parties involved.

The final orders and outcomes of these cases would depend on the specific findings of the court during the hearings. The court aimed to deliver just and timely resolutions to the legal issues presented, ensuring that all proceedings were conducted with due regard to the law and the rights of the individuals involved.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established