Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 18 July 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 18 JULY 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Witnesses

For Bail Application via Video Link
to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Tiffany Louise Shaw

For Bail Application
Steven Albert Thomas
Aaron James Crosswell
Jodi Anne Williams
Darren Freeman

2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Cosmas Paite
v
State of Tasmania

Andrew Dare
v
State of Tasmania

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Samuel Peter Uithol and Jason John Uithol
v
Nebojsa Miloradovic

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Bail Application via Video Link from
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Tiffany Louise Shaw

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, sitting in Hobart, heard a range of cases over the course of the day. One of the key matters before the court was a bail application made by Tiffany Louise Shaw. This case involved a dispute over whether Shaw should be granted bail, with arguments presented via a video link to Court 1 in Launceston. The legal issues centred on the principles of bail law, including considerations of flight risk, the severity of the alleged offence, and the circumstances of the applicant. The court was tasked with balancing these factors to determine whether the conditions of bail could be met in this instance.

Acting Justice Porter, who presided over the bail application, carefully weighed the evidence and submissions from both the prosecution and the defence. The court considered the nature and seriousness of the charges against Shaw, her personal circumstances, and any factors that might indicate a risk of reoffending or failing to appear in court. Ultimately, the court decided that the application for bail should be denied, finding that the risk of Shaw reoffending or not appearing in court outweighed the considerations in favour of granting bail. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of the evidence and the legal principles applicable to bail decisions.

The court's decision was communicated clearly and succinctly, with the Acting Justice outlining the reasoning behind the denial of bail. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring public safety and the proper administration of justice in reaching its conclusion. The final orders of the court were that Tiffany Louise Shaw would remain in custody until further court proceedings, reflecting the court's determination that the conditions for bail were not met in this case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established