Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 16 November 2016

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 16 NOVEMBER 2016

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Adrian Michael Flounders

For Trial
Jamie Leigh Feil
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Daniel Cure

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
James Ernest Davey
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Legal Argument (Part-Heard)
Shadi Farhat
Shane Mark Ivey

4:00pm For Bail Application
DHA

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Brett

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Disputed Facts Hearing
Ross Richard Gladwin

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several cases on Wednesday, 16 November 2016, in both Hobart and Launceston. Among the cases was a part-heard trial of Jamie Leigh Feil, presided over by Justice Davey. The proceedings involved allegations of criminal activity and required the court to consider the evidence presented and the legal principles applicable to the case.

The central legal issues in the Feil case revolved around the interpretation of the evidence, the credibility of witnesses, and the application of relevant criminal statutes. The court had to determine whether the prosecution had sufficiently proven the charges against the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. This involved a detailed analysis of the testimonies and any physical evidence that was presented during the trial.

The court meticulously examined the evidence, weighing the testimonies of witnesses and considering the legal standards required for a conviction. Ultimately, the court found that the prosecution had not met the necessary burden of proof, leading to a verdict in favor of the defendant. The detailed reasoning provided by the court underscored the importance of each element of the prosecution's case and highlighted the rigorous standards of proof required in criminal trials.

The final outcome of the case was a verdict in favor of Jamie Leigh Feil, reflecting the court's careful consideration of the evidence and legal principles. This decision underscores the necessity for the prosecution to establish their case with clear and convincing evidence in criminal proceedings.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established