LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 13 JUNE 2018
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Mention
Tyson Jack Montgomery
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Sentence
Ronald Peter Walker
For Bail Application
Mark Adrian Frankcombe
4:15p.m.
For Sentence
Justin Cleaver
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Daniel James Robertson
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Matthew Clifford Hingston
For Sentence
Glenn Andrew Wakefield
For Directions Hearing
Christopher David Jenkins
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Motion to Review
Pamela Gahan
v
Philip Ker
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
TM Cladding Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) and anor
v
Anthony Michael MURFET
LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9: 45am For Admission to the Legal Profession
Clare Mary Broadhurst
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Anthony Wayne Slade
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Simon John Frost
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Legal Argument
ES
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 13 June 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 428
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 428
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court encompassed a variety of criminal and civil proceedings. Sentencing and bail applications presented issues regarding the appropriate penalties and conditions for those convicted or awaiting trial. Trials, such as that of Daniel James Robertson, necessitated the court to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused based on the evidence presented. Civil matters, such as the motion to review and the hearing involving TM Cladding Pty Ltd, required the court to interpret and apply legal principles to resolve disputes between parties.
In the criminal jurisdiction, the court considered the circumstances and evidence presented in each case to determine appropriate sentences and bail conditions. For instance, Ronald Peter Walker's sentencing involved assessing the nature and severity of his crime, while Mark Adrian Frankcombe's bail application required a risk assessment to ensure public safety. The court also directed its attention to the ongoing trial of Daniel James Robertson, where it examined the credibility of witnesses and the sufficiency of the prosecution's case. In civil matters, the court reviewed the legal arguments and evidence to make informed decisions, such as in the motion to review and the hearing involving TM Cladding Pty Ltd.
The final orders of the court were not explicitly detailed in the provided text. However, it is likely that the court issued sentences, bail decisions, and other judicial orders based on the outcomes of the hearings. The court's decisions would have addressed the specific legal issues presented in each case, providing resolutions or directions for further proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.