Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 13 June 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 13 JUNE 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m

For Mention

Tyson Jack Montgomery

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Sentence
Ronald Peter Walker

For Bail Application
Mark Adrian Frankcombe

4:15p.m.
For Sentence
Justin Cleaver

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Daniel James Robertson
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link to Risdon Prison Complex

Matthew Clifford Hingston

For Sentence

Glenn Andrew Wakefield

For Directions Hearing

Christopher David Jenkins

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Motion to Review
Pamela Gahan
v
Philip Ker

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Hearing

TM Cladding Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) and anor

Anthony Michael MURFET

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9: 45am For Admission to the Legal Profession
Clare Mary Broadhurst

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Anthony Wayne Slade

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Simon John Frost

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Legal Argument

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Wednesday, 13 June 2018, with several cases listed across its various courts. The hearings ranged from criminal to civil matters, reflecting the broad jurisdiction of the court. Notable cases included the sentencing of Ronald Peter Walker, the bail application by Mark Adrian Frankcombe, and the trial of Daniel James Robertson. The court also addressed civil matters such as a motion to review and a hearing involving TM Cladding Pty Ltd.

The legal issues before the court encompassed a variety of criminal and civil proceedings. Sentencing and bail applications presented issues regarding the appropriate penalties and conditions for those convicted or awaiting trial. Trials, such as that of Daniel James Robertson, necessitated the court to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused based on the evidence presented. Civil matters, such as the motion to review and the hearing involving TM Cladding Pty Ltd, required the court to interpret and apply legal principles to resolve disputes between parties.

In the criminal jurisdiction, the court considered the circumstances and evidence presented in each case to determine appropriate sentences and bail conditions. For instance, Ronald Peter Walker's sentencing involved assessing the nature and severity of his crime, while Mark Adrian Frankcombe's bail application required a risk assessment to ensure public safety. The court also directed its attention to the ongoing trial of Daniel James Robertson, where it examined the credibility of witnesses and the sufficiency of the prosecution's case. In civil matters, the court reviewed the legal arguments and evidence to make informed decisions, such as in the motion to review and the hearing involving TM Cladding Pty Ltd.

The final orders of the court were not explicitly detailed in the provided text. However, it is likely that the court issued sentences, bail decisions, and other judicial orders based on the outcomes of the hearings. The court's decisions would have addressed the specific legal issues presented in each case, providing resolutions or directions for further proceedings.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established