LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 12, DECEMBER 2018
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video link
Ricky John Izard
For Bail Consent
ADES
Peter Glenn Howlett
For Trial
Shaun Anthony Dennison
John Gilbert Timbs
Monique Rose Lynch
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Application for Removal of Surety
Craig Raymond Silva
For Plea
Noah Neptune Weiss-Trew
Rachel Ellen Morgan
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession
Amelia Clare Hickman
Alexander Bernard Hill
In Chambers
4:30 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
RV Pty Ltd
v
Connector Park Pty Ltd
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Direction Hearing by telephone
Brennan Loch Reeves and anor
v
Medesse Pty Ltd
12:00 p.m.
Discovery
Michael Richard Saltmarsh and anor
v
Westpac Banking Corporation
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention via video link to
Risdon Prison Complex
SJR
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Shane Allen Wheldon
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 12, December 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 585
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 585
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether bail should be granted to an individual awaiting trial, the admissibility of evidence and procedural aspects of trials, the removal of sureties in bail applications, and procedural matters related to civil litigation. The court was also required to decide on the eligibility of applicants for admission to the legal profession.
In its reasoning, the court considered the merits of each application and matter brought before it. For bail applications, the court balanced the risk of flight against the severity of the charges and the potential impact on the community. In the case of the trial, the court ensured that the principles of natural justice were upheld and that the accused received a fair trial. The court also assessed the necessity for the removal of sureties based on the specific circumstances of each case. The eligibility for admission to the legal profession was evaluated based on the applicants' qualifications, conduct, and fitness to practise. The direction hearing concerned procedural aspects of discovery in civil litigation, focusing on whether the discovery application was justified and adhered to the relevant legal standards.
The final orders of the court were not detailed in the excerpt provided. However, it is expected that the court would have made decisions on bail applications, set dates for trials, ruled on the removal of sureties, admitted eligible applicants to the legal profession, and provided directions on the discovery application.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.