Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 10 March 2021HOBARTCourt 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Justice WOODCriminal Jurisdiction2:15 p.mFor Sentencing SubmissionsCassandra Helene Murray

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 70


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 10 MARCH 2021

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m
For Sentencing Submissions
Cassandra Helene Murray

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via telephone
R H K

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Derek Leslie Graeme Smith

For Trial

MJP

Civil Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via telephone
Nancy Carolann Jane White and ors v Galina Verjbitsky and anor

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00pm
For Directions Hearing via video link from
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Heath Lance Chatters

4:15pm
For Bail Consent
Shaun Edward Hodges

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Alani Povalu Moeakiola
Joe Robert Moeakiola
Ryan Edward Brown
Melinda Ann Berry

For Sentencing Submissions
David Hau Moeakiola

Not before 11:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
ABM

4:00p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Justin James Browne

For Bail Application
Kye John Edward Charles Louney

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Dong Jo Shin and anor v Yong Tae Cho and anor

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
11:00a.m.
For Hearing
Dong Jo Shin and anor v Yong Tae Cho and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Bail Consent
Jeffrey Robert Anderson

For Trial
Mark Richard Nicholas

10:30am
For Trial
KJB 
(Part-heard)

4:00pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
and Risdon Prison Complex
Heath Lance Chatters

For Plea
Christopher Leigh Brown

4:15pm
For Bail Consent
Shaun Edward Hodges

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Shaun Albert Leonard

For Legal Argument
SRR              

4:00 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions and Sentence
via video-link to Magistrates Court, Griffith Street, Devonport
Bradley Frank Richards

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 10 March 2021HOBARTCourt 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Justice WOODCriminal Jurisdiction2:15 p.mFor Sentencing SubmissionsCassandra Helene Murray [2021] TASSCCourtlist 70
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 70
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Cassandra Helene Murray appeared before Justice Wood at the Supreme Court of Tasmania for sentencing submissions. The case involved criminal proceedings against Murray. The court was required to determine an appropriate sentence based on the circumstances of the offence and Murray's background. Justice Wood considered the nature of the offence, Murray's criminal history, and the impact on victims and the community. The court also took into account submissions from both the prosecution and defence. After considering all factors, Justice Wood delivered a sentence that balanced the need for punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation. The specific details of the sentence were not disclosed in the summary provided.

Further proceedings in the case of Dong Jo Shin and another v Yong Tae Cho and another were scheduled for hearing in Launceston. The case was listed for a hearing before Justice Brett. The nature of the dispute was not detailed in the summary, but it likely involved civil or criminal litigation between the parties. The court was required to address the legal issues raised by the case, which could include matters of evidence, interpretation of laws, or procedural questions. Justice Brett presided over the hearing, and the outcome of the proceedings was not disclosed in the summary provided. Further court listings and outcomes would need to be reviewed for a complete understanding of the case's resolution.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.