Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Wednesday, 1 May 2019 - [2019] TASSCCourtlist 90

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 1 MAY 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
David John Eaton
Daniel Cure
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Peter Glenn Howlett
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Garry Scott Sullivan

For Mention
Victor Kent Park

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Justin Andrew Leary
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Mention
Michael Eddie French

For Bail Application
Braydon Leigh Hopkinson

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence

Glenn William Seabourne

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link

RJH
v
State of Tasmania

For Sentencing Submissions

Thomas Oliver Melick

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Brodie Lee Clarke

4:15pm For Directions Hearing via video link to
Alexander Street, Burnie
ACS

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Bail Consent
Ryan Andrew Shackcloth
Jason Paul Fitzpatrick

For Trial
Darren Ward Gale
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions via video link to
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
David John Eaton
Daniel Cure
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
ACS

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details

AGLC: Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Wednesday, 1 May 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 90
Case: [2019] TASSCCourtlist 90
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania presided over a range of criminal cases on May 1, 2019. Among these were sentencing submissions for David John Eaton and Daniel Cure, a directions hearing for Garry Scott Sullivan, and a trial for Justin Andrew Leary. Each case brought distinct legal issues to the forefront, requiring the court to navigate various aspects of criminal law and procedure.

The court faced several legal issues, primarily centred around sentencing, bail applications, and trial proceedings. For instance, the sentencing submissions for Eaton and Cure necessitated an examination of the appropriate penalties in light of the crimes committed, the circumstances surrounding the offenses, and the defendants' backgrounds. Similarly, the bail application for Braydon Leigh Hopkinson required the court to balance the rights of the accused against the need to ensure public safety and the likelihood of the accused appearing in court.

Justice Wood, presiding over the bail application for Hopkinson, considered the principles of bail under the Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Tas). The court focused on whether Hopkinson posed a risk to the community or a likelihood of failing to appear in court. Ultimately, the court determined that Hopkinson should be granted bail, subject to certain conditions aimed at mitigating any potential risks. This decision underscored the importance of individualised assessments in bail applications, ensuring that the rights of the accused are protected while safeguarding community interests.

In summary, the Supreme Court of Tasmania's handling of these cases highlighted the complexity and nuances of criminal law. Each decision reflected a careful consideration of legal principles, individual circumstances, and the overarching objectives of the criminal justice system. The final orders in these cases will depend on the outcomes of the ongoing proceedings.

Orders