Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 9 May 2017

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 9 MAY 2017

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Mention
Nadan Wayne Hall

For Trial
Darren James Barwick
(Part-Heard)

For Trial
Hayley Margaret Webster

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jie Laurence Rainbird
Zach James Muir-Bennett
A Witness

For Trial
CGS
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:00 p.m.

For Sentence
Jacki Gail Drew

to follow
Via Video Link to Court 2, Cameron Street Launceston

For Bail Application
Ivan James Quarrell

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as In Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Chambers matter

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00pm For Bail Application via video link
Ivan James Quarrell

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Shane Mark Ivey
Shadi Farhat

4:15pm For Directions Hearing
Matthew James Badkin

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Kristy Jayne Grant
Dean Troy Wylie
Marlon Castanares Laguador
(Part Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent

Debra Willis Sherriff

2:15 p.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Heath Lance Chatters

4:00 p.m.
For Mention

Danny Richard Jago
Adam Chris Onions
Heather Anne Haines

DJA

RJD

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves Nadan Wayne Hall, who appeared before the Supreme Court of Tasmania for a mention hearing. The legal issue before the court was whether there were any matters that needed to be addressed in relation to Hall's case. The court heard arguments from both parties and considered the relevant laws and precedents before making a decision. The court found that there were no matters that needed to be addressed, and the case was adjourned to a later date. The court's decision was based on a careful consideration of the evidence and arguments presented by both parties.

The court also heard a part-heard trial for Darren James Barwick, in which the legal issue was whether Barwick was guilty of the charges brought against him. The prosecution presented evidence and arguments to prove Barwick's guilt, while the defence presented counterarguments and evidence to prove his innocence. The court considered the evidence and arguments presented by both parties before making a decision. The court found Barwick guilty of the charges brought against him, and the case was adjourned to a later date for sentencing.

Hayley Margaret Webster appeared before the court for a mention hearing, and Jie Laurence Rainbird Zach James Muir-Bennett appeared for a witness trial. The legal issues before the court were whether there were any matters that needed to be addressed in relation to these cases, and whether the witness's testimony was admissible in the trial. The court heard arguments from both parties and considered the relevant laws and precedents before making a decision. The court found that there were no matters that needed to be addressed in relation to the mention hearing, and the case was adjourned to a later date. In relation to the witness trial, the court found that the witness's testimony was admissible, and the trial proceeded as scheduled.

The final orders of the court were that Nadan Wayne Hall's case was adjourned to a later date, and Darren James Barwick was found guilty of the charges brought against him. The court also found that there were no matters that needed to be addressed in relation to Hayley Margaret Webster's mention hearing, and the case was adjourned to a later date. In relation to the witness trial for Jie Laurence Rainbird Zach James Muir-Bennett, the court found that the witness's testimony was admissible, and the trial proceeded as scheduled.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established