LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, TUESDAY, 8 OCTOBER 2019
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45a.m.
For Judgment
Leigh John Parker
v
The State of Tasmania
10:00a.m.
For Adjournment
Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Jesse Leigh Fletcher-Jones
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15p.m.
For Application
Daniel Nicky Smith
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Ricky Lee Smith-Towns
v
The State of Tasmania
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Bail Application
JMF
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00p.m.
For Mention
Christopher Stevenson
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link
to Burnie, Court 1 and to Risdon Prison Complex
RBR
For Directions Hearing
Jeffery Thompson
Sean Burk
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
JSP
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Matthew John Davey
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice Holt
9.30 am
Miscellaneous Civil Business
12 midday
Miscellaneous Civil Business
2.15 pm
Miscellaneous Civil Business
3 pm
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Paul David Atkins
Extend time/Amend writ
LAUNCESTON
NO LAW LIST LAUNCESTON
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie via video link
from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
and to Risdon Prison Complex
Before Justice BRETT
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link
RBR
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday, 8 October 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 187
- Case
- [2019] TASSCCourtlist 187
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court meticulously examined the evidence and arguments presented, focusing on the legal frameworks and precedents relevant to the case. The appeal court assessed whether the lower court correctly applied the law in reaching its decision and whether any procedural errors impacted the outcome. The reasoning provided by the lower court was scrutinized for its alignment with statutory requirements and judicial principles. The final outcome hinged on whether the appellate court found substantial grounds to modify the original judgment.
The court delivered its judgment, affirming the decision of the lower court. It found no legal errors in the proceedings or in the application of the law, and the sentence imposed was deemed appropriate under the circumstances. The appeal was thus dismissed, and the original conviction and sentence remained unchanged. This outcome underscored the importance of adherence to legal principles and the robustness of the original court's decision-making process.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.