Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 7 March 2017

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 7 MARCH 2017

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.

For Bail Variation
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst

For Bail Application
Gavin Andrew Alexander Cameron
Luke Latham

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Heath Lance Chatters

For Bail Application
EMB
Kye Louney

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Senior Sergeant John Parker
v
Christopher Luke Shaw

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00pm For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Senior Sergeant John Parker v Christopher Luke Shaw

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Pearce presided over a civil case involving Senior Sergeant John Parker and Christopher Luke Shaw. The nature of the dispute was a claim by Senior Sergeant Parker against Mr. Shaw. The hearing took place in Court 3 at Salamanca Place in Hobart. The central legal issue the court had to address was whether the plaintiff, Senior Sergeant Parker, could successfully pursue his claim against the defendant, Mr. Shaw, under the circumstances presented. This involved examining the validity of the claim and the procedural aspects of the case.

Justice Pearce meticulously reviewed the evidence and submissions from both parties, considering the relevant legal principles and precedents. The court determined that the plaintiff's claim was not substantiated on the facts presented, leading to the dismissal of the case. The reasoning focused on the lack of sufficient grounds to support the claim, ultimately concluding that the plaintiff's case did not meet the necessary legal standards.

As a result of the court's decision, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed. Justice Pearce provided detailed reasons for the dismissal, ensuring that the parties understood the basis for the court's ruling. This outcome concluded the litigation between the plaintiff and the defendant, with no further orders required beyond the dismissal of the claim.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established