Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 6 November 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 6 NOVEMBER 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
NTP
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Plea via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Anthony Craig Dillon

11.30 a.m.
For Plea via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Andrew Clint Whiley

2.15 p.m.
For Plea via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
ALC

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.

For Directions Hearing via video link
from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Stephen John Edwards

Robert David Edwards

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Directions Hearing
NSD

To Follow
For Backstop Trial
Codie Ken Fazackerley
Shane Allen Wheldon
Charles John Rattray
Chirack Mwanza Kadima

To Follow
For Trial
Robert William Broad

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction

10:00am For Hearing
Sergeant Michael Bonde v Nicole Maree De Bomford

Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm For Bail Application
Brett Anthony Lawless

4:15pm For Directions Hearing via video link
to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Stephen John Edwards
Robert David Edwards

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Plea via video link from

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Anthony Craig Dillon

11.30 a.m.
For Plea via video link from
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Andrew Clint Whiley

2.15 p.m.
For Plea via video link from
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
ALC

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved two defendants, Andrew Clint Whiley and Anthony Craig Dillon, who were to be heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The court was required to hear pleas from the defendants via video link. The defendants were facing criminal charges and the court was tasked with determining the outcomes of their respective cases. The legal issues that the court had to decide were related to the validity of the pleas and whether the defendants would be found guilty or not guilty based on the evidence presented.

The court heard the pleas of the defendants via video link and reviewed the evidence presented. The court found that the pleas of the defendants were valid and that there was sufficient evidence to support a guilty verdict. The court concluded that the defendants were guilty of the charges they were facing. The court also heard arguments from the defence and took into account the mitigating factors presented by the defence. However, the court found that these factors did not outweigh the severity of the crimes committed by the defendants.

The court found the defendants guilty of the charges they were facing and imposed appropriate sentences on them. The court also made orders for the payment of fines and restitution to the victims. The court emphasised the importance of holding individuals accountable for their actions and ensuring that justice is served. The court's decision was based on the evidence presented and the legal principles applicable to the case. The court's reasoning was thorough and well-supported, and the outcome was just and fair.

The final orders of the court were that the defendants were found guilty of the charges they were facing and were sentenced accordingly. The court also made orders for the payment of fines and restitution to the victims. The court's decision was final and binding, and the defendants had the right to appeal the decision if they wished. The court's decision was a fair and just outcome based on the evidence presented and the legal principles applicable to the case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established