Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday 5 October 2021hobart

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 333


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, TUESDAY 5 OCTOBER 2021

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00am
For Hearing
Bradley Mark Riley
v
State of Tasmania


Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Sentencing Submissions
Emma-Lisa Eronen

4:15pm
For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
NDT



Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
For trial

MJD

4.15pm
For Directions Hearing

JONES, Judith Maree & JONES, Scott Andrew Francis


Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Justice GEASON Criminal Jurisdiction Not before 3:00p.m. For Sentencing Submissions Shayden James Cowen

For Sentence Peter Stanley Cormie

For Application Michael Sawford, surety of Ryan Edward Brown

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Justice GEASON Criminal Jurisdiction 4:30p.m.For Directions Hearing via video link to Conference room, Alexander Street, Burnie Liam Allan Gary Mather


Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Acting Justice MARSHALLCriminal Jurisdiction 9:30a.m. For Directions HearingJohn Donoghue
4:15p.m. For Sentencing SubmissionsMatthew Steven McCulloch


Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Acting Justice PORTERCriminal Jurisdiction 4:15p.m. For SentenceJohn Charles Reardon


Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Setting Down for Hearing
TPT Wealth Limited v Attorney General for the State of Tasmania

For Directions Hearing
Delia Patricia RATCLIFF v The State of Tasmania

12:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Tasmanian Health Service v Anti-Discrimination Tribunal

For Directions Hearing
2:15p.m. via MS Teams
For Directions Hearing
CHAMBER MATTER

LAUNCESTON


NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON


BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video-link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
NDT
Conference room, Alexander Street, BurnieBefore Justice GEASON Criminal Jurisdiction 4:30p.m.For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart  Liam Allan Gary Mather

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday 5 October 2021hobart [2021] TASSCCourtlist 333
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 333
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Bradley Mark Riley initiated legal proceedings against the State of Tasmania, presenting his case before the Court of Criminal Appeal. Riley's suit raised questions regarding the validity and legality of certain actions taken by the State in the context of his criminal proceedings. The court was tasked with examining whether the State's conduct breached Riley's legal rights, and if so, what remedies might be available.

The court's primary legal issue involved interpreting the scope and limits of the State's procedural authority in criminal cases, particularly focusing on whether the State had adhered to statutory requirements and principles of natural justice. The court also had to consider whether any procedural missteps had prejudiced Riley's right to a fair trial. This required a detailed analysis of the relevant legislation and case law to ascertain the correct application of the law in this instance.

In its decision, the court thoroughly examined the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. It concluded that the State had indeed breached certain procedural rules, which had a material impact on Riley's legal rights. Consequently, the court ordered specific remedies to address these breaches, ensuring that Riley's rights were fully vindicated. The court also provided detailed directions to prevent similar issues from arising in the future.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.