LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 4 DECEMBER 2018
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Margaret Anne Otto
Bradley Scott Purkiss
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Kenneth David Reynolds
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Pre- Recording
JSR
2:15 p.m.
For Trial
Shaun Anthony Dennison
John Gilbert Timbs
Monique Rose Lynch
4:00 p.m.
For Plea
Aaron Campbell Brumley
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
3:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Stephen John Edwards
v
Avant Insurance Ltd
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Fingal Pastoral Pty Ltd
v
Page Seager Lawyers
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:30am For Mention via video link to
Risdon Prison Complex
Codie Ken Fazackerley
Shane Allen Wheldon
CJR
To Follow
For Trial (Part Heard)
Belinda Leone Colbran
4:00pm For Bail Variation
Shaun Andrew Tringrove
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
VIG
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link
from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Margaret Anne Otto
Bradley Scott Purkiss
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 4 December 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 577
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 577
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court was required to decide involved procedural matters related to the directions hearing. This included determining the appropriate steps to be taken in the case, scheduling of future hearings, and possibly addressing any preliminary matters that needed to be resolved before the case could proceed to trial.
The court's reasoning and outcome were not explicitly detailed in the document, but the nature of the hearing suggests that the court focused on ensuring that the defendants were aware of the procedural steps and timelines involved in their case. The directions hearing is a critical stage where the court outlines the path forward, ensuring both parties understand their obligations and the schedule of events.
The final orders of the court, however, were not provided in the document, and would likely include directions for further hearings, possibly setting specific dates and times for future appearances, either in person or via video link.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.