Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 3 August 2021HOBARTCourt 8, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCivil Jurisdiction10:00a.m.For JudgmentMatthew Hurst vLaunceston City Council and...

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 3 AUGUST 2021

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Judgment
Matthew Hurst
v
Launceston City Council and ors

For Trial
TR & KR Shipton Pty Ltd
v
Hongbing Zhao and anor

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30AM
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
PTM

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Matthew John Davey

3:00pm
For Bail Application
Shannon Matthew Pursell

4:15pm
For Application to Vary Bail
Joe Robert Moeakiola

For Mention
Wayne Vonk

For Plea
Taha Afyouni

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
Banjo Manser

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Mention
Boral Construction Materials Group Limited
v WB Maintenance & Concreting Services Pty Ltd and anor

11:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Veronica Rita Ragaglia v The Trustee for the D&A Williamson Family Trust t/as CrossFit 42 South and ors

2:15p.m. via MS Teams
For Directions Hearing
Ann Marise Garling v Tony Patiniotis

For Mention
Alysha Prout v Department Of Communities

For Mention
CHAMBER MATTER

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Trial
Robert Peter Matthewson
(part heard)

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30AM
For Directions Hearing via video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart.
PTM

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
12:30pm
For directions hearing
B K S M

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Matthew Hurst initiated legal proceedings against Launceston City Council and others. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania in Hobart. The nature of the dispute was not explicitly stated in the document, but it involved a claim against the Launceston City Council and possibly other parties. The Chief Justice BLOW presided over the case in the Civil Jurisdiction. The legal issues before the court were not detailed in the provided text, but typically in such cases, the court would need to address matters related to the validity of the claim, the jurisdiction of the court, and the merits of the case against the Launceston City Council and any other respondents.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not provided in the text. In cases such as these, the court would examine the evidence presented by both parties, interpret relevant laws and precedents, and apply them to the facts of the case to reach a decision. The court would also consider the procedural aspects of the case to ensure that the proceedings were conducted fairly and in accordance with legal requirements. Without specific details, it is not possible to determine the final orders or the court's decision in this case. However, the outcome would depend on the court's findings regarding the validity of the claim and any applicable legal principles.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established