Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 28 November 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY 28 NOVEMBER 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.
For Judgment
DJT
v
State of Tasmania

For Sentence
Leigh John Parker
Leigh Douglas Monks

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

4.15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
NHJR

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
AGD
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Breach of Bail
Chauncy Aaron Bell

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jamie Michael Clark

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction

11:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Fingal Pastoral Pty Ltd
v
Page Seager Lawyers

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Belinda Leone Colbran

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
David John Miller

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jeremy Brad Scott

4.15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
NHJR

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of DJT v State of Tasmania involved a dispute between DJT and the State of Tasmania, which was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The matter was listed for judgment on the specified date and time before the Chief Justice. The nature of the dispute was not detailed in the text, but it is likely related to a criminal matter given the context of the court and the mention of other criminal cases in the same document.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide are not explicitly stated in the provided text. However, as this is a criminal case, the court would have been required to consider the evidence presented by both parties, apply relevant laws and legal principles, and make a determination on the matter at hand. This could include questions of guilt or innocence, the appropriate sentence if found guilty, or other legal matters pertinent to the case.

The court's reasoning and outcome are not detailed in the provided text. In a criminal case, the court would have considered the evidence presented by both parties, applied relevant laws and legal principles, and made a determination on the matter at hand. This could include a finding of guilt or innocence, the imposition of a sentence if the defendant is found guilty, or other legal matters pertinent to the case.

There is no mention of final orders in the provided text. However, in a criminal case, the court may impose a sentence on the defendant if they are found guilty, or may make other orders as appropriate based on the specific circumstances of the case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established