Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 28 February 2017

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 28 FEBRUARY 2017

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Director of Public Prosecutions
v
TGW

2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
LBS
v
State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:30 p.m.
For Bail Application
David King
(Part Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
James Leslie Grey

2:30 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by Video Link
Benjamin Angus Shield
v
State of Tasmania

For Bail Application via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Nathan Mayne

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW and Acting Justice MARSHALL
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Josephine Ramos Cooper
v
Klaus Dieter Neubert

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

2:30pm For Bail Application via video link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Nathan Mayne

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was involved in several hearings on 28 February 2017. One notable case was Director of Public Prosecutions v TGW, heard by the Court of Criminal Appeal, which involved the review of a decision made by a lower court. Another significant case was LBS v State of Tasmania, where the Court heard a case on criminal jurisdiction. This case involved an appeal against a decision made by a magistrate, which was being reviewed for its legal correctness and adherence to established legal principles.

The legal issues before the Court of Criminal Appeal in Director of Public Prosecutions v TGW revolved around the interpretation and application of statutory provisions and case law in the context of criminal proceedings. The court had to determine whether the lower court had correctly applied the law in reaching its decision. In LBS v State of Tasmania, the court needed to decide whether the trial judge had correctly exercised their discretion in matters related to criminal jurisdiction, such as the admissibility of evidence and the appropriateness of certain legal procedures.

The Court of Criminal Appeal found that the lower court had indeed correctly applied the law in Director of Public Prosecutions v TGW, upholding the decision. In LBS v State of Tasmania, the Court determined that the trial judge had exercised their discretion appropriately, and the decision was affirmed. The court's reasoning was grounded in a thorough analysis of the legal principles applicable to the cases, ensuring that the outcomes were consistent with established legal standards.

No specific final orders were mentioned in the case summaries, but the court's decisions in both cases would have implications for the parties involved, potentially affecting their legal rights and obligations.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established