LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 26 JUNE 2018
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Mark Anthony Lanteri
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Mark Adrian Frankcombe
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Justin Thomas Knott
Nicholas Edward Wright
For Trial
EMB
(Part-Heard)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Motion to Review
Jamie Michael Clark
v
Aron Harvey
2:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing by Video Link
Fingal Pastoral Pty Ltd
v
Page Seager Lawyers
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:30p.m.
For Sentence
Andrew David Gilley
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Plea
Frank Andrew Mark Buchanan
To Follow
For Facts
Graham Wells-Brown
Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15pm For Directions Hearing via Video Link to
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Fingal Pastoral v Page Seager Lawyers
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Thomas Joseph Wilson
Ivan James Quarrell
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Plea
Samuel Peter Newell
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Joseph William Hancock
4:15 p.m.
For Mention
Jaqueline Maree Broomhall
For Sentence
Kurt Charles Guest
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 26 June 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 437
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 437
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court ranged from criminal proceedings such as pleas, bail applications, and trials, to civil matters including motions to review and directions hearings. The court was tasked with addressing procedural aspects in both criminal and civil jurisdictions, as well as substantive issues in the cases heard.
The reasoning and outcome of the cases varied. In the criminal jurisdiction, the court dealt with pleas, trials, and sentencing, applying relevant criminal law principles. In the civil jurisdiction, the court considered motions to review and directions hearings, focusing on procedural fairness and the management of litigation. The specifics of the decisions and outcomes were not detailed in the provided list, but the court's role was to ensure that legal processes were followed and justice was administered appropriately in each case.
The final orders of the court, including any judgments, sentences, or directions, would have been made and recorded in the respective case files, detailing the court's decisions on the matters heard.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.