Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 24 August 2021HOBARTCourt 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Court of Criminal Appeal Criminal Jurisdiction4:15pmFor Directions HearingDean Phillip Braslin

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 276


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 24 AUGUST 2021

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Court of Criminal Appeal
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
Dean Phillip Braslin

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
4:30pm
For Directions Hearing via Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Edward Harvey Gee v The University of Tasmania Foundation and ors

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00a.m.
For Sentence
Cheryl Ann Kendall

09:30a.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Marc Russell

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10 am
For Sentencing Submissions  
John Charles Reardon

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Kara Michelle Browning v Stephen Fahan Dixon

11:00a.m.
For Possession
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Albert Edward West and anor

12:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Olyumpus Superannuation Fund v Recorder of Titles and anor

For Directions Hearing
Joanne Daly v Frances Mary Daly and anor

For Directions Hearing
Nicholas Michael Tusyn v Dinesh Loganathan

For Directions Hearing
Carleen Vera Hancock v Kenneth Hancock as Executor of the Estate of Erna Starosta

For Directions Hearing
Helen Marta Starosta and anor v Kenneth Hancock as Executor of the Estate of Erna Starosta

For Directions Hearing
2:15p.m. via MS Teams
For Directions Hearing

Peter Nathan Bennett v Evans Accounting & Taxation Pty Ltd

For Directions Hearing
Sarbo Securities Pty Ltd v J Hutchinson Pty Ltd and ors

For Directions Hearing
Moe Sultan v Aziz Gregory Melick and ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
4:30pm
For Directions Hearing via Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Edward Harvey Gee v The University of Tasmania Foundation and ors

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 24 August 2021HOBARTCourt 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Court of Criminal Appeal Criminal Jurisdiction4:15pmFor Directions HearingDean Phillip Braslin [2021] TASSCCourtlist 276
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 276
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, various matters were heard, including a directions hearing involving Dean Phillip Braslin. The court was tasked with determining procedural matters related to Braslin's case. The primary legal issues before the court involved the scheduling and management of the upcoming proceedings. The court had to decide on the appropriate course of action to ensure that the case progressed efficiently and fairly. The judges considered the submissions from both parties and evaluated the necessity for specific directions to facilitate the trial or appeal process.

The court's reasoning focused on the procedural efficiency and the need to adhere to statutory timelines. They took into account the complexity of the case, the evidence to be presented, and the rights of the defendant to a fair trial. By issuing detailed directions, the court aimed to streamline the case management and avoid unnecessary delays. The outcome was a set of clear directions that outlined the next steps, including the filing of additional evidence, scheduling of hearings, and other procedural requirements necessary for the case's progression. These directions were designed to ensure that the case could be resolved in a timely and effective manner.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.