Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday 22 October 2019 - [2019] TASSCCourtlist 196

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, TUESDAY 22 OCTOBER 2019

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00a.m.

For Plea and Mention

N V L

10.30.a.m.

For Hearing

Arthur Fairwell

State of Tasmania

4.15.p.m.

For Directions Hearing

Mark Rodney Jones

William Christopher Foran

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15p.m.

For Plea

Marcus Raymond Hardwick

4:15p.m.

For Directions Hearing

Hayden Joel Larner

For Sentence

WACC

For Bail Application

Scott Cook

Tyler Anthony Causon

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Legal Argument

David Shaw

Michael John Benjamin Wells

For Mention

4:00 p.m.

Rodney Gene Crosswell

4:30 p.m.

For Sentence

Daniel John Baker

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Associate Justice HOLT

9:30 am

Admission to the Legal Profession

IN THE MATTER OF the Mutual Recognition Act 1992 Cth s 19 Deborah BAILEY

Defence/Expert Evidence/Refer for Mediation

Lisa DOBLE v Tasmanian Health Service (Royal Hobart Hospital)

Directions – Notice of Appeal

Francis XIBERRAS and anor v GUARDIANSHIP AND ADMINISTRATION BOARD

Interlocutory Application – Amend Statement of Claim

Emma Valesse WARN v Tasmanian Health Service (Royal Hobart Hospital)

Interlocutory Application

Pamela NICHOLSON v Calvary Health Care Tasmania Limited (ABN 29 129 926 790) t/as Calvary Health Care Tasmania Lenah Valley Campus, Lenah Valley Tasmania and anor

Directions Hearing

FIRSTMAC FIDUCIARY SERVICES PTY LTD (ACN 105 052 515) v John DOURIAS AS TRUSTEE OF THE 60 BAROSSA FAMILY TRUST and anor

11:00 am

Rule 414 Directions Hearing

Digga Excavations Pty Ltd v Linear Capital Pty Ltd

P.M Woolfoed & S.E Woolford Trading As P&S Painting v Norske Skog Paper Mills (Australia) Ltd

12 Noon

Directions/Originating Application

Yasmina LYNCH v Nenad STANOJEVIC and anor

2:15 pm

For Mention

Luke Anthony SHAW v ACTING SERGEANT MICHAEL BONDE

Interlocutory Application/Expert Documents

Justin Steven ACKERS v Patrick Quaid BERRY and anor

Directions Hearing

Tasmanian Botanics Pty Ltd v Mark Richard DE VRIES and ors

In Chambers

3:00pm

Directions Hearing by Telephone

Legal Profession Board of Tasmania v Barbara Etter

Barbara Etter v Legal Profession Board of Tasmania

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE

Civil Jurisdiction

2:15p.m.

For Hearing

Sven Wiener

The Tasmanian Electoral Commission

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Acting Justice MARTIN

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:00 a.m.

For Sentence

Jarrod James Lodge

For Plea

Mandy Margaret Irene Turner

10:00 a.m

For Trial

Michael John Jones

(Part-Heard)

11:30 a.m.

For Trial

Jarod Wayne Judge

4:00 p.m.

For Mention via Video Link to Risdon Prison Complex

Nathan Scott Davidson

For Bail Application

BJHC

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Sam Gerrity

Michael William Keogh

4:00 p.m

For Plea and Facts

Samuel George Nichols

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Details

AGLC: Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday 22 October 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 196
Case: [2019] TASSCCourtlist 196
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the case of Arthur Fairwell versus the State of Tasmania was heard. The nature of the dispute was not explicitly stated in the case summary, but it likely involved a criminal matter. The case was listed for a hearing before Justice Wood in Court 1 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The case was scheduled for 10.30 a.m.

The legal issues the court was required to decide were not explicitly stated in the case summary. However, the case was listed for a hearing, which typically involves the examination of evidence, witness testimonies, and legal arguments from both parties. The court had to evaluate the presented information and make a decision based on the law and the facts of the case. The outcome of the hearing would depend on the merits of the arguments and the evidence presented by both sides.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not provided in the case summary. The summary only listed the cases scheduled for hearing, plea, and mention, without providing details on the court's decision or reasoning. The outcome of the case would be determined after the hearing and the evaluation of the presented information. The court's decision would be based on the law and the facts of the case, and it would be communicated to the parties involved.

No final orders were mentioned in the case summary. The summary only listed the cases scheduled for hearing, plea, and mention, without providing details on the court's decision or any final orders. The final orders would be determined after the hearing and the evaluation of the presented information. The court's decision would be communicated to the parties involved, and any final orders would be executed accordingly.

Orders