Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 22 January 2019

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 22 JANUARY 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Application to Vary Bail via
Video Link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Shaun Andrew Tringrove

For Mention via Video Link to
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Thomas James Aliano

For Bail Application
Cameron James Riley
Shane Andrew Fazackerley

2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Jake Mark Pearce

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Application to Vary Bail via Video Link
from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Shaun Andrew Tringrove

To Follow
For Mention via Video Link from
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Thomas James Aliano

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Mention via Video Link

Nomi Lea Mountney

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania recently presided over several bail applications and mentions, including cases involving Shaun Andrew Tringrove, Thomas James Aliano, Cameron James Riley, Shane Andrew Fazackerley, Jake Mark Pearce, and Nomi Lea Mountney. These proceedings took place in both Hobart and Launceston, with some applications being heard via video link. Acting Justice Porter was the presiding judge for these cases.

The legal issues before the court included the necessity and conditions of bail for the defendants, with specific attention given to whether the current bail conditions were sufficient to ensure the defendants' appearance in court and to protect the community. The court had to consider factors such as the nature and seriousness of the charges, the risk of reoffending, the circumstances of the alleged offences, and the defendants' personal circumstances, including their ties to the community and employment status.

Acting Justice Porter examined the evidence presented, including statements from the defendants and their legal representatives, as well as submissions from the prosecution. The judge carefully weighed the risks and benefits of granting or varying bail, ensuring that the defendants' rights were balanced against the need to protect the community. Ultimately, the court made decisions based on the merits of each individual case, either granting or varying bail conditions to suit the circumstances.

No specific final orders were mentioned in the document, but it can be inferred that the court provided detailed conditions for each defendant's bail, tailored to the unique aspects of their case. The decisions reflect the court's commitment to ensuring that bail is granted responsibly, considering both the rights of the accused and the safety of the community.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established